• sloonark@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a high school teacher and I recently was discussing this. Protip: don’t talk to 14 year olds about how if something is in between hard and soft, it’s firm. 🙄

  • jantin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait… It’s not “firm” as in “company that made the stuff”? FIRMware = the official software a firm pushes to patch things they make

  • kog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firmware is just software that runs in a different place.

    Source: me, I write firmware sometimes at work.

  • TechnologyClassroom@partizle.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Extra firmware cannot be modified.

    Firm firmware might be able to be modified, but documentation is largely unknown.

    Silken firmware is easily modified by the user.

    These names are taken from tofu packaging.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    By the way, “joystick” was kinda rude back in the day, but nobody even notices now.

  • irkli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firmware is a metaphor, not an analogy.

    Hardware is… Hard. Changing it is a big deal. It has mass!

    Software is… Soft. It goes away when you turn the power off, and it’s modified at runtime. It weighs nothing, changes “instantly”.

    Firmware is neither and both. It’s stored in hardware (EPROM, EEPROM, Flash, …) that you can take out and insert.

    The metaphor is around temporality and physicality.

    Sorry, pedant nerd.

    At the time EEPROMs were becoming common, core memory was still common enough. Core was great! Power fail circuitry caused registers to save and the whole machine state was remembered.

  • NewAgeOldPerson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Started computer science in grade school with only an hour of actual computer time a week. A LOT of theory and history. Charles Babbage, Ada, ENIAC, etc.

    This stuff was drilled into our heads. Same with bit, byte and, halfway between bit and byte, a nibble. It’s a thing. 4 bits is a nibble.

    Funny enough, I couldn’t code to save my life now.

  • Lachy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought this was common knowledge. I distinctly remember this being taught in a basic high school computing class back in the 90’s.

    • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So in the 90s I had different computer based classes in high school.

      There was a “computers” class, which is probably the closest to what you’re talking about, in which we mostly learned how to use Microsoft Works.

      I also was fortunate enough to have some programming classes. We started out with QBasic and then the more advanced level was visual basic.

      None of these discussed firmware. If it came up at all it was probably a casual side conversation because someone bricked something trying to update it.

        • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I did have a classmate try to replicate Simon in QBasic but he kept needing the input reversed.

          I told him the “feature not a bug” line and suggested he call it NOMIS

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Had to look that up - seen it before but never played. Sorry for the late reaction, lemmy.world had enough server problems that I didn’t see my notifications in > 2 weeks…

            • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No worries. Lemmy feels way more casual than Reddit anyway and I got notifications for months old comments there from time to time

              • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Now if only I could find a way to open - from my notification about your response - your comment in the context of the community - but on my own instance. I have tried clicking on “Show context” -> links to the home server of the community, where I can not post / respond. Clicking anywhere else:

                • Username: takes me to your profile
                • Community: takes me to my instance’s view of the community in which we are communicating
                • Post name: takes me to my instance’s view of the thread in which we are communicating, but of course without context to the comment
                • link symbol: does nothing
                • Show context: see above, takes me to the correct place, on the wrong instance
                • Timestamp: does nothing

                :(

                Anyways, I like lemmy a lot, but I think with the recent nasty defederation announcement at lemmy.world from hexbear I’ll have to find another instance as home…

                • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  FWIW I home at midwest.social. It’s not strictly for the Midwest US but you’ll see a lot of stuff for that region there. It’s also left leaning and I think the only instances they’ve defederated so far have been for extremism.

                  I’m also using jerboa on my phone and from my inbox there’s a speech bubble button which lets me make this response from my inbox.

                  I don’t know if either of these things will help you but I figured I’d offer them just in case they did.

  • Max_Power@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    TIL! I have never even wondered why it is called that. Just took it as a fact and went along with it.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      possibly because a “firm” is also a word for a business / company, so “firmware” as the chipset software coming from the firm that manufactures said chipset makes perfect sense. at least that’s why I never sought an alternate explanation - and I am not fully convinced OP is right, actually.

      • CaptObvious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firmware

        History and etymology

        Ascher Opler coined the term firmware in a 1967 Datamation article,[2][failed verification] as an intermediary term between “hardware” and “software”. In this article, Opler was referring to a new kind of computer program that had a different practical and psychological purpose from traditional programs from the user’s perspective.

        As computers began to increase in complexity, it became clear that various programs needed to first be initiated and run to provide a consistent environment necessary for running more complex programs at the user’s discretion. This required programming the computer to run those programs automatically. Furthermore, as companies, universities, and marketers wanted to sell computers to laypeople with little technical knowledge, greater automation became necessary to allow a lay-user to easily run programs for practical purposes. This gave rise to a kind of software that a user would not consciously run, and it led to software that a lay user wouldn’t even know about.[3]

        Originally, it meant the contents of a writable control store (a small specialized high-speed memory), containing microcode that defined and implemented the computer’s instruction set, and that could be reloaded to specialize or modify the instructions that the central processing unit (CPU) could execute. As originally used, firmware contrasted with hardware (the CPU itself) and software (normal instructions executing on a CPU). It was not composed of CPU machine instructions, but of lower-level microcode involved in the implementation of machine instructions. It existed on the boundary between hardware and software; thus the name firmware. Over time, popular usage extended the word firmware to denote any computer program that is tightly linked to hardware, including BIOS on PCs, boot firmware on smartphones, computer peripherals, or the control systems on simple consumer electronic devices such as microwave ovens, remote controls.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But firmware doesn’t have to be from the firm that manufacturers said chipset. Third party firmware is a common thing.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          see that’s something that makes perfect sense but that I wasn’t actually aware of… Sorry for the late reaction, lemmy.world had enough server problems that I didn’t see my notifications in > 2 weeks…

    • pistachio@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think he does know what a firmware. Just didnt’t realize the origin of the term.

      A firmware is neither soft nor hard… it’s firm.

      (Or maybe I completely misunderstood the tweet 🙄

      • tobier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh the name, completely misunderstood this as “I don’t know what firmware is”.

  • 21trillionsats@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My non-tech wife tried to tell me “obviously that’s why it’s called that” when I’ve been writing software (and even some minor firmware hacking) for 30 years.

    Is this the real life?