Yikes.

  • DarkWasp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

    Zuck: Just ask.

    Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

    [Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

    Zuck: People just submitted it.

    Zuck: I don’t know why.

    Zuck: They “trust me”

    Zuck: Dumb fucks.“

    • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How the fuck did Harvard students act so stupid and give out their info like that? I thought they were like the smartest people in the US. 🤔

      • TesterJ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most Harvard students are still just 18-22 year old “kids”. Think of how dumb/naive you were at that age.

        • Captain_Nipples@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Try telling that to a 18-22 yr old. You think you know everything at that age. Then you get older and realize no one knows any fucking thing

          • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a reason second-year students are called sophomores. It’s a compound with the same roots as “sophisticated” and “moron”. It literally means “learned idiot”. It’s referring to the students who have a year of schooling under their belt, and think that they understand everything about the world. It’s basically referring to the Dunning-Krueger Effect, where people who know very little about something are the most likely to overestimate their knowledge on the topic.

          • Syrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be fair, when you’re at that age and come into contact with dozens of “adults” that never mentally grew past 12, you’re bound to think you’re “very smart”.

        • BornVolcano@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As a 21 year old I would be offended but then I remember I just admitted my exact age on the internet

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is still I think the most telling glimpse into who the “ZUCK” really is. Looking at what meta has become, how it has operated… No matter how professional and respectable he acts.

      This is who he really is.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t it’s a fair assessment - dude was just a kid.

        I’ve watched some podcasts and interviews and I think he’s a much more complex of a person. I do genuinely think he’s thinks he’s doing good and I do think that Meta stuff is a net benefit to the humanity.

        Even if you hate Facebook it brought people together in so many places, especially if you consider developing world.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doing good does not absolve you of having done evil.

          Zuck has utterly failed in preventing facebook from doing clear, preventable, harm.

          I don’t get to walk free, no matter how many homeless people I feed, if I kill one.

          The same should go for corporations. If they do evil, once, they should done. Not fined. There is no math which makes the bad that facebook does, necessary to achieve the good it does.

        • Yendor@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you watched ‘The Social Dilemma’?

          Facebook actively promotes things that will make you scared and angry, because those are the emotions that drive the most engagement and get the most clicks.

  • mokoshark69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a reminder to lemmy users, that this new meta expriement will use the ActivityPub protocol, meaning that it can interact with other lemmy instances, please urge your lemmy instance admins to de-federate from this crap as soon as it launches!

    • mnstrspeed@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But why? Isn’t the whole point of federation that we can interact with people in other communities? Don’t we want these big platforms to adopt ActivityPub? Completely walling them off seems counterproductive

      Not defending Meta, just curious

        • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting and I’d say you’re right. If you were to see a mass adoption of the fediverse (such as Twitter imploding and mastadon becoming the replacement) there would be an immediate attempt by the big tech players to gain control of it in some way. And this is exactly how they would try to do it.

        • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is there a fediverse version of Facebook?

          Very roughly,
          Lemmy and Kbin = Reddit
          Masterson = Twitter

          So what equals Facebook

      • Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t we want these big platforms to adopt ActivityPub?

        I certainly don’t. I abandoned Facebook years ago because of how BS they were getting with privacy concerns and social manipulation. Last thing I want is to bring those dumpster fires here. They join the platform, I will migrate to whichever Instances defed them or leave Lemmy entirely if necessary. Simply put, it’s been a breathe of rational, civil air here. While it is early days keeping that hostile-to-humanity crap out of here is obvious minimum we should be doing.

    • Nobody@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta rolling into the fediverse like the martians in Mars Attacks.

      “Don’t run! We’re you’re your friends!”

  • ImperialATAT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That seems reasonable. I think I’ll throw in my social security number and DNA sample for good measure… just in case they need it.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, he’s a big fan of access. May as well just make an extra category marked “everything”.

  • doggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow. I know people are talking a bit about the privacy concerns here on Lemmy, but enterprise social media is something else entirely…

    I wouldn’t trust Facebook with my Nintendo friend code, let alone all this