Someone on Lemmy posted a phrase recently: “If you’re not prepared to manage backups then you’re not prepared to self host.”

This seems like not only sound advice but a crucial attitude. My backup plans have been fairly sporadic as I’ve been entering into the world of self hosting. I’m now at a point where I have enough useful software and content that losing my hard drive would be a serious bummer. All of my most valuable content is backed up in one way or another, but it’s time for me to get serious.

I’m currently running an Ubuntu Server with a number of Docker containers, and lots of audio, video, and documents. I’d like to be able to back up everything to a reliable cloud service. I currently have a subscription to proton drive, which is a nice padding to have, but which I knew from the start would not be really adequate. Especially since there is no native Linux proton drive capability.

I’ve read good things about iDrive, S3, and Backblaze. Which one do you use? Would you recommend it? What makes your short list? what is the best value?

  • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use the unlimited consumer backblaze with private key on a windows VM. I provision a 40tb iscsi connection to the VM from a NAS and all kinds of various homelab systems and devices store thier backups there. Works great and is the cheapest possible option at $9 a month.

    • Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Is that not against their TOS? Could make the service more expensive for the rest of us

      • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not sure about the iscsi protocol. They allow VMs, including harddrives via USB, so the point of doing this making it more expensive does not apply considering someone could just hook up 100tb+ of USB drives and still be clear under the TOS.

        If they did have a problem with this I would just do that instead.

          • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Well yes and no. The rate at which you get your data back is where the gotcha lies anything up to 8TB is free if you send them $280 and they’ll refund the money once they get the drive back. Anything over 8TB is where it gets pricey.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              And do that multiple times?

              There aren’t any “gotchas” they absolutely lose money us who store more than a few TB but its worth it considering that we are in the minority.

              Someone from BB posted a graph showing the distribution of data usage over all users and the VAST majority are under 1-2 TB

  • dawa@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m on Pcloud, server with rsync+rclone to move files from file system to cloud and use it as a unified file system.

    The lifetime storage offer from pcloud has been worth it for me and I even upgraded it from 2 to 12 TB

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Timely post.

    I was about to make one because iDrive has decided to double their prices, probably because they could.

    $30/tb/year to $50/tb/year is a pretty big jump, but they were also way under the market price so capitalism gonna capital and they’re “optimizing” or someshit.

    I’ve love to be able to push my stuff to some other provider for closer to that $30, but uh, yeah, no freaking clue who since $60/tb/year seems to be the more average price.

    Alternately, a storage option that’s not S3-based would also probably be acceptable. Backups are ~300gb, give or take, and the stuff that does need S3-style storage I can stuff in Cloudflare’s free tier.

  • brewery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    After some research on here and reddit about 6 months so, I settled on Borgbase and its been pretty good. I also manually save occasionally to proton drive but you’re right to give up on that as a solution!

    The hardest part was choosing the backup method and properly setting up Borg or restic on my machine properly, especially with docker and databases. I have ended up with adding db backup images to each container with an important db, saving to a specific folder. Then that and all the files are backed up by restic to an attached external drive at well as borgbase. This happens at a specific time in the morning and found a restic action to stop all docker containers first, back them up, then spin them back up. I am find the guides that I used if it’s helpful to you.

    I also checked my backups a few times and found a few small problems I had to fix. I got the message from order users several times that your backups are useless unless you regularly test them.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you mine? Always sounded like the best option if you dont have a friend in another georegion to replicate-to

      • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I did for a few years when the network started, but it became increasingly difficult to do so from a residential IP with slow upload speeds (cable internet).

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been using Restic to Backblaze B2.

    I don’t really trust B2 that much (I think it is mostly a single-DC kind of storage) but it is reasonably priced and easy to use. Plus as long as their failures aren’t correlated with mine it should be fine.

    • I quadrupal vote for this combination.

      You could trust B2 more; maybe dig into their structure. They’re solid, and not only that they provide an awesome service with their yearly HD failure rate evaluations, in which they describe the structure of their data centers.

      I’m terms of NPS, I’m on their side. Unless something comes out and shady business practices, I’m brand loyal to B2. Been with then for years, and love the service, pricing, and company.

      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think it depends on your needs. IIUC there storage is “single location”. Like a very significant natural disaster could take it offline or maybe even lose it. Something like S3 or Google Cloud Storage (depending on which durability you select) is multi-location (as in significantly distinct geographical regions). So still very likely that you will never lose any data, but in the extreme cases potentially you could.

        If I was storing my only copy of something it would matter a lot more (although even then you are best to store with multiple providers for social reasons, not just technical) but for a backup it is fine.

        • I think I see what you’re saying.

          B2 has multiple data centers around the world - at least 3 in the US and 1 in EU, that I know of. If you want your data replicated, you have to create buckets in multiple locations and connect them for replication, which they’ll do for you (the replication).

          If you’re saying that they don’t automatically store multiple copies of your data in multiple locations for you, for free, you’re right. But they do have multiple data centers located around the world, and you can create multiple buckets and configure them for automatic replication so you have redundancy. You have to pay for the storage at each replicated location, though. If you want a bucket in Sacramento, it’ll cost you those pennies. If you want it replicated to Rest on, you’ll pay double the pennies. If you want it also replicated to Amsterdam, triple the pennies.

          I don’t think it’s fair to say that they’re single location that could have a natural disaster and you therefore lose your storage. It’s only like that if you set it up that way, and it’s pretty trivial to set up global replication - it just costs more.

          • kevincox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s true. And I’m not saying B2 is bad, it is just something that you should be aware of.

            Their automatic replication isn’t quite as seamless as GCS or S3 though. For example deletes aren’t replicated so you will need a cleanup strategy. Plus once you 2x or 3x the price B2 isn’t as competitive on price. My point is that it is very easy to compare apples to oranges looking at cloud storage providers and it is important to be aware.

            For me B2 is a great fit and I am happy with it, but I don’t wan to mislead peope.

        • pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Enabling multi DC redundancy is really easy though. The other providers you mentioned may have it by default, but they’re also a lot more expensive.

          I love that they let me pick my own redundancy strategy, without forcing me to pay for theirs

  • nickiam2@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use restic with a wrapper script to automate it on all of my machines. The backend storage can be anything that speaks S3, so B2, or iDrive would both work. I currently use Storj for my backend. It’s globally distributed storage, so no single point of failure geographically and it’s cheap. Backblaze is also a great company, but I’ve grown a little skeptical since they went public.

  • vividspecter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    A server in a friend/family member’s home. All of the cloud based backups I’ve encountered seem either unaffordable or have annoying limitations.

    • egonallanon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yup I’ve got a box in my mum’s house that all my off site backups go to and it’s a damn site cheaper just to give her some money for the electricity cost of it each month than pay for any cloud service.

    • Droolio@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      100% this. OP, whatever solution you come up with, strongly consider disentangling your backup ‘storage’ from the platform or software, so you’re not ‘locked in’.

      IMO, you want to have something universal, that works with both local and ‘cloud’ (ideally off-site on a own/family/friend’s NAS; far less expensive in the long run). Trust me, as someone who came from CrashPlan and moved to Duplicacy 8 years ago, I no longer worry about how robust my backups are, as I can practice 3-2-1 on my own terms.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Or simply sneakernet drives to a friend’s home. Good excuse to visit a friend more often.

  • bier@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you’re talking multiple Terrabytes and are located in the EU you might want to consider AWS Glacier I have like 6Tb on there and pay sub 20€ p.m. If you’re in the EU you can request one free migration download by contacting the support. Otherwise you’ll pay thousands.

  • rhys@mastodon.rhys.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    @gedaliyah If you’re not married to managed cloud services, services like rsync.net or a Hetzner storage box work very well. They require more effort, but you have complete control and can do some fun things (like using rclone’s crypt module with them). Plus rsync.net is super useful if your sources use ZFS.

    Of the cloud providers, Backblaze is the one that anecdotally seems most popular.

  • eyes_uncl0uded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I started this past year with iDrive because of their incredible welcome deal if you switch from another service. I started a trial with Dropbox with the same email and sent them the requested screenshots for verification- they approved it. Spending $10 for the first year of 5TB

    It’s pretty slow on uploading, but it works. Customer service is attentive and caring. Probably going to go to a local NAS and a different online solution within the year. It’s a nice cheap padding as I learn how to do this right. The intro deal might be worth it for you, too, though I don’t think it’s the best long-term option