

The main issue for me is the way they react to it. Not only is there no warning about this, but they also refuse to fix it because it would break client support and they prefer backwards compatibility over security
The main issue for me is the way they react to it. Not only is there no warning about this, but they also refuse to fix it because it would break client support and they prefer backwards compatibility over security
If you plan to use fail2ban, I assume you want to make your Jellyfin accessible from the public internet. Please be aware, that large parts of the Jellyfin Backend are not properly authenticated and allow unauthorized, potential mapping of your library and even unauthorized streams.
Well, as far as I can tell american vendors don’t really try to enter that market, since Americans only buy giant pickups anyway. Most European carmakers shat the bed and only recently actually started trying which might already decline soon as more conservative parties get elected which don’t push as much for greener tech.
Its basically only Asian vendors that innovate in any meaningful way
They all do. It’s called peer review
Sure, I could
You know you can just copy the URL and prepend it with “archive.xx/” right?
Funny, never thought about the option to just remove the accumulated metal from a stars core. But in that distant of a future it should be possible to withstand the conditions and mine the metals to make the sun live longer
yeah, that one threw me for a loop and I consider my vocabulary to be fairly decent. I just assumed it was missing the apostroph to make it “won’t”. Thanks for clearing that up
Will have to even
Can’t wait for this to arrive on my phone
And I agree wholeheartedly. I’m just saying, that the idea of replacing YouTube with something federated fails due to lack of upload speeds, as cool as it would be. Still, having it even just as a small scale alternative would be cool
Even most people hosting at home, which is already an incredibly small bubble, have only the default upload of something like 40Mbit which is more than plenty for internet usage and thus the only thing most providers supply, since people favour download speeds. You usually have to specifically order increased uploads speed, which not enough people do to build something that could serve as an alternative to youtube
The usual household has nowhere near the upload capacity to meaningfully stream videos.
Holy shit. Thanks. I actually had it exposed as I wanted some of my Plex users to basically beta test my Hardware acceleration config on Jellyfin (another reason why I won’t switch anytime soon) but I just shut that thing down and won’t touch it until I absolutely have to
I haven’t looked at the beta client in a while and was wondering how they could’ve gotten it ready this fast. Guess I’ll pin my app version real quick.
Damn it, I don’t want to switch to Jellyfin
So on the one hand other countries are supposed to stop their “freeloading” on the US military but on the other hand they just can’t help acting as world police?
Keep your grubby hands to yourself if you want to keep your ball that much and leave the rest of us alone
They are fictional
Don’t forget light pollution that wrecks peoples and animals biorythms
Have a look at Qualityland, it has (satirical) ads in it. The whole thing is a comment on consumerism
That depends entirely on your target audience as well as the devices you want to use it on. Smart TVs don’t really support VPNs and my parents would not know how to even activate that let alone set it up on their end. I have a lot of non tech savvy users, so Plex is just way more convenient and accessible.