

What were you using 64gb of ram for with that spec!? Sounds like you need someone to take 32gb of ram off your hands


What were you using 64gb of ram for with that spec!? Sounds like you need someone to take 32gb of ram off your hands


How many atom bombs less than helpful is it?


I appreciate the positive reinforcement, thank you


Totally valid, but leaves no room for me to do a stupid reply! Thank you for sharing litotes.


“It wouldn’t be invalid” isn’t the worst double negative in the world but it would be valid to say that it was unpleasant to read it when you could have used a less misdirecting choice of prose that wouldn’t have had such a negative effect on my reading comprehension. That is to say that I could have enjoyed it less but I certainly didnt enjoy it as much as i could have if you hadn’t used the double negative when a single positive wasn’t any further from reach.


Gotcha…I’ve always struggled to pick up the vocabulary around technical concepts - I guess ive just never prioritised it, and now this whole new field has materialised with a whole new vocabulary to go along with it! I get the tech. The words are my achilles heel.


Okay so now I think you’re describing the behaviour I take for granted with the harness i.e. Claude Code.
Having good repo readiness through a good agents/claude.md file + tests + docs means the LLM is able to read more files into its context.
It never occurred to me that anyone would prompt in isolation of their repos but I guess thats exactly what it was like for me last year when I was just feeding ChatGPT prompts away from the repo.


Ok so i think i do all of these things and would just describe them as “other ways to prompt and LLM” - i think the nuance youre shooting for here is that using these methods you are “pre-preparing” the prompt - not thinking about it at prompt-time and thus likely to miss stuff.
e.g. Feeding a TODO is just the same as copy-pasting that todo in as a prompt.
Have I understood you correctly?


Tell me more? It’s the only way I’m familiar with interacting with an LLM


For me, that’s not compelling. We all have different priorities.


If you’re referring to their announcement last year about discontinuing meshnet, they’ve retracted that.
I know there are alternatives but why would I go to any effort to set them up when i have something that has worked exactly as I want it to for the last 2yrs? The cost of nordvpn is sufficiently low enough that I wouldn’t switch to something just because it’s free.


I’ve used NordVPN for a couple of years and never had reason to switch. None of it gets in my way, and it’s just worked.
I’m sure others are just the same, but ive no reason to put in effort to change when I have a working solution.
Plus it’s double effort cus I dont think anyone else does a meshnet alternative so I’d be setting up tailscale too.


Start at 1 and work your way up in increments of 1.
See you in about 100 years give or take a few decades.


I cannot, because it’s not something I track. It’s usually some site ive only ever visited that once, worked around their shit engineering, and moved on with my life. So it’s not that specific sites don’t work, it’s that ive had to use Chrome or edge 6 times this year.
I can’t remember a browser ever saying I needed chrome. Even Google Meet works fine…just functionality is reduced. A small price to pay for not giving Google the keys.


What browser do you use?
I’m getting a bit tired of website incompatibility with Firefox but when the alternative is Chrome, I’m sticking with FF.
Got a link? I’d love to get me one of those


That’s not how people made money. That’s what precipitated the crash. Shorting companies that were exposed would have been one route to make money - but as I said before, the smart piece there is in the timing not the mechanism. Shorting stock isnt difficult…Shorting it at the right time can be.


Judo is more focussed on throwing and grappling than it is on joint locks and holds, or “folding”.
The more you know.
How does one access jellyfin remotely?