They call it “dark traffic” - ads that are not seen by tech-savvy users who have excellent ad blockers.

Not surprised that its growing. The web is unusable without an ad blocker and its only getting worse, and will continue to get worse every month.

  • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Advertisers do not have the right to demand my attention, or to brainwash me. I have every right to deny them and decide what to allow inside my head. This is war.

    “We paid for the right to show you this!”

    You didn’t pay me, motherfucker, and my price is everything you have, or fuck off and die.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    What’s frustrating to me is the idea that law makers and advertisers believe I don’t have a right to alter data that comes onto things I own. And nobody chime in with the brain dead “☝️🤓 actually you don’t own it.” Because even if you wanna waste time with that stupid distraction, I own my computer. I built it from parts.

    Controlling my perception is my right. If I wanna use things that block ads that’s my right. PERIOD. I NEED TO BLOCK ADS BECAUSE OF MY DISABILITY.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    The trade body called it “illegal circumvention technology”, said 12ft.io has been locked by its web host, and promised to take similar action against other paywall bypassing technologies.

    Just because you send bits to my network does not oblige me to render them. That’s like saying I broke the law back when I had cable and changed channels during ad breaks. Falls flat on its face.

  • J52@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bottom line: if I’m forced to consume ads on a device belonging to me - I will rather throw it away!

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    2 days ago

    The use of the term “Dark traffic” here is to paint the use of ad-blockers as something nefarious. Don’t use it, fuck these people right in their stupid mouths.

    I propose using the terms “clean traffic”, for ad-blocked website traffic, and “dogshit traffic” for everything else.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      depending on your household’s browsing habits, it can be downright insane how much traffic goes through ones network (and the web at large), that is just nothing but dog shit.

      I monitored my pihole at my place and my own traffic is usually no more than 15% garbage with about 750,000 domains blocked, but the second grandma or grandpa starts doomscrolling boomer things on their phones and ipads. I saw the network traffic at 60% blocked one time and I had to confront them and flatly ask them “what the fuck are you doing on your phone?”

      also set up a Region exemption or whatever, blocking russian, chinese, and a whole bunch of other untrustworthy TLDs and im literally showing my grandmother the repeated attempts to communicate with something in fucking China in real time whilst she’s playing some solitare game she downloaded.

    • grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe we could turn it around: adblockers are tools that block ads and other kinds of dark traffic such as trackers and malicious scripts.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Website: “You appear to be using an ad blocker.” Me: “You appear to be correct.”

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If ad networks weren’t the number 1 way to get malware installed on your machine, didn’t slowly take over the dedicated space for the actual content of a website, or put pressure on the websites in question to only publish things inoffensive to the advertisers maybe adblockers wouldn’t be such an issue.

    If your site can’t exist without being a cesspit of annoying and useless infomercials and a deployment mechanism for malicious code injection then your site should not exist.

    Not too many people had an issue with static banner ads back in the day after all except greedy website operators and advertisers.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    2 days ago

    I used to maintain a website for a bicycling club in my county that was great for getting people into biking, getting people out the house, making friends, and staying fit.

    We had a banner ad along the top of the site for a local bicycle/bicycle repair shop that aided the club a lot and was very reasonable.

    He got something out of it (publicity and a seal of approval towards the value/quality of his work), and we got something out of it (money to run the site, and a bit left over for things like puncture repair kits and the occasional celebratory drink after an arduous ride).

    Nobody bats an eyelid to those ads. They are reasonable.

    What we have now isn’t that. What we have now is an insecure, malware-infested privacy nightmare that ruins webpages and stresses everybody out.

    Use Firefox + uBlock origin for your own sanity. Don’t let big tech make you feel guilty for not going along with their game.

    • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Use Firefox + uBlock origin for your own sanity. Don’t let big tech make you feel guilty for not going along with their game.

      100% this and also, consider allow-listing specific sites which deserve your support, or better yet, contribute directly if you can – e.g. your local bike club forum, your local newspaper, a blogger whose work you enjoy, etc., assuming of course, the ads are reasonable.

    • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Guilty? Hahahahahaha

      They will never make me feel guilty because they are the guilty ones. Guilty of greed and of destroying our society. Fuck big advetisers. They would put billboards in outre space if they thought it would make them a tenth of a penny more in profit.

      I dont even consider them human to be honest.

  • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    When piholes go mainstream they are fully cooked. Even tech illiterate in your family won’t get the ads

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Maybe if they didn’t use very intrusive ads people would not install ad-blockers so much

    Many websites put a video playing in later in top of the text, with another layer of ads and tiny space to read… the website would be unreadable without ad-blocks

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would have to be millenials since Gen z exist almost entirely in the walled garden of a phone app.

      Most people now a days don’t even use a desktop with a browser. I honestly expect that most of what they are “seeing” is just web scrapers for the LLM. Those are likely to “block” ads simply based on efficiency, since it shows down crawling.

        • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          It honestly creeps me out that so many people don’t curate what they watch and just consume whatever ‘their feed’ puts in front of them.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The web has almost always been unusable without an adblocker. Ads today are less malicious, but more insidious. Clicking the wrong ad in 2003 would brick your computer. Clicking the wrong ad today means you’ll have to cancel a credit card after your personal data is compiled and sold on the black market.

    Nothing new. Ads don’t fuel a free internet. They fuel a business model. The free internet is fueled by the time and donations of kind, dedicated people.