You might not even like rsync. Yeah it’s old. Yeah it’s slow. But if you’re working with Linux you’re going to need to know it.
In this video I walk through my favorite everyday flags for rsync.
Support the channel:
https://patreon.com/VeronicaExplains
https://ko-fi.com/VeronicaExplains
https://thestopbits.bandcamp.com/
Here’s a companion blog post, where I cover a bit more detail: https://vkc.sh/everyday-rsync
Also, @BreadOnPenguins made an awesome rsync video and you should check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eifQI5uD6VQ
Lastly, I left out all of the ssh setup stuff because I made a video about that and the blog post goes into a smidge more detail. If you want to see a video covering the basics of using SSH, I made one a few years ago and it’s still pretty good: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FKsdbjzBcc
Chapters:
1:18 Invoking rsync
4:05 The --delete flag for rsync
5:30 Compression flag: -z
6:02 Using tmux and rsync together
6:30 but Veronica… why not use (insert shiny object here)
I still prefer tar for quick and dirty same box copies.
tar cf - * | (cd /target; tar xfp -)I’ll never not upvote Veronica Explains. Excellent creator and excellent info on everything I’ve seen.
Veeam for image/block based backups of Windows, Linux and VMs.
syncthing for syncing smaller files across devices.Thank you very much.
Rsnapshot. It uses rsync, but provides snapshot management and multiple backup versioning.
Yah, I really like this approach. Same reason I set up Timeshift and Mint Backup on all the user machines in my house. For others rsync + cron is aces.
Yes, but a few hours writing my own scripts will save me from several minutes of reading its documentation…
It took me like 10 min to setup rsnapshot (installing, and writing systemd unit /timer files) on my servers.
I’m sure I could script something similar in under 10 (hours).
I use syncthing.
Is rsync better?
Syncthing works pretty well for me and my stable of Ubuntu, pi, Mac, and Windows
I’m not super familiar with Syncthing, but judging by the name I’d say Syncthing is not at all meant for backups.
Syncthing is technically to synchronize data across different devices in real time (which I do with my phone), but I also use it to transfer data weekly via wi-fi to my old 2013 laptop with a 500GB HDD and Linux Mint (I only boot it to transfer data, and even then I pause the transfers to this device when its done transferring stuff) so I can have larger data backups that wouldn’t fit in my phone, since LocalSend is unreliable for large amounts of data while Synchting can resume the transfer if anything goes wrong. On top of that Syncthing also works in Windows and Android out of the box.
its for a different purpose. I wouldn’t use syncthing the way I use rsync
I used to use rsnapshot, which is a thin wrapper around rsync to make it incremental, but moved to restic and never looked back. Much easier and encrypted by default.
I think the there are better alternatives for backup like kopia and restic. Even seafile. Want protection against ransomware, storage compression, encryption, versioning, sync upon write and block deduplication.
This exactly. I’d use rsync to sync a directory to a location to then be backed up by kopia, but I wouldn’t use rsync exclusively for backups.
comparing seafile to rsync reminds me the old “Space Pen” folk tale.
rsync for backups? I guess it depends on what kind of backup
for redundant backups of my data and configs that I still have a live copy of, I use restic, it compresses extremely well
I have used rsync to permanently move something to another drive though
Grsync is great. Having a GUI can be helpful
If you want rsync but shiny, check out rshiny
It’s slow?!?
Compared to something multi threaded, yes. But there are obviously a number of bottlenecks that might diminish the gains of a multi threaded program.
With xargs everything is multithreaded.
That part threw me off. Last time i used it, I did incremental backups of a 500 gig disk once a week or so, and it took 20 seconds max.
I was planning to use rsync to ship several TB of stuff from my old NAS to my new one soon. Since we’re already talking about rsync, I guess I may as well ask if this is right way to go?
It depends
rsyncis fine, but to clarify a little further…If you think you’ll stop the transfer and want it to resume (and some data might have changed), then yep,
rsyncis best.But, if you’re just doing a 1-off bulk transfer in a single run, then you could use other tools like
xcopy/scpor - if you’ve mounted the remote NAS at a local mount point - just plain oldcpThe reason for that is that
rsynchas to work out what’s at the other end for each file, so it’s doing some back & forwards communications each time which as someone else pointed out can load the CPU and reduce throughput.(From memory, I think Raspberry Pi don’t handle large transfers over
scpwell… I seem to recall a buffer gets saturated and the throughput drops off after a minute or so)Also, on a local network, there’s probably no point in using encryption or compression options - esp. for photos / videos / music… you’re just loading the CPU again to work out that it can’t compress any further.
It’s just a one-off transfer, I’m not planning to stop the transfer, and it’s my media library, so nothing should change, but I figured something resumable is a good idea for a transfer that’s going to take 12+ hours, in case there’s an unplanned stop.
yes, it’s the right way to go.
rsync over ssh is the best, and works as long as rsync is installed on both systems.
On low end CPUs you can max out the CPU before maxing out network—if you want to get fancy, you can use rsync over an unencrypted remote shell like
rsh, but I would only do this if the computers were directly connected to each other by one Ethernet cable.
I couldn’t tell you if it’s the right way but I used it on my Rpi4 to sync 4tb of stuff from my Plex drive to a backup and set a script up to have it check/mirror daily. Took a day and a half to copy and now it syncs in minutes tops when there’s new data
Y’all don’t seem to know about rsbackup, which is a terrible shame for you.
Yeah it’s slow
What’s slow about async? If you have a reasonably fast CPU and are merely syncing differences, it’s pretty quick.
It’s single thread, one file at a time.
That would only matter if it’s lots of small files, right? And after the initial sync, you’d have very few files, no?
Rsync is designed for incremental syncs, which is exactly what you want in a backup solution. If your multithreaded alternative doesn’t do a diff, rsync will win on larger data sets that don’t have rapid changes.
I use cp and an external hdd for backups
that’s great until it’s not.
