

Thanks for explaining, didn’t know that part about memory safety. I agree, for new apps it makes more sense to pick Rust over C/C++ (unless maybe if you’re a C veteran). However, if it’s just as fast as C/C++, wouldn’t it make sense to leave existing C/C++ apps as they are (as long as you don’t want to add new functions)? Not judging, just genuinely curious (especially since Rust hat stirred up some drama among Linux maintainers, from what I have heard)



Huh, so it’s not something simple I have missed regarding why so much software is being rewritten in Rust… I see that appearing so often, so I thought there was maybe a bigger reason I’m not seeing. Anyways, thanks again, appreciate the explanations 👍