Chris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agoBiden signs TikTok “ban” bill into law, starting the clock for ByteDance to divest itwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up196arrow-down10
arrow-up196arrow-down1external-linkBiden signs TikTok “ban” bill into law, starting the clock for ByteDance to divest itwww.theverge.comChris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoTiktok has been a subject of national security concerns since at least 2020.
minus-squareFacebones@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year agoWith absolutely zero tangible evidence, which is why it was a complete non-starter for four years until Biden lost control of the narrative.
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 year agoWell, no. The courts struck down Trump’s Tiktok ban because he used an executive order that overstepped his authority.
minus-squareFacebones@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoBecause executive order was the only way to get it done - other methods would have required evidence that doesn’t exist. You’re only backing my argument lmao.
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThat’s the opposite of what the court said.
Tiktok has been a subject of national security concerns since at least 2020.
With absolutely zero tangible evidence, which is why it was a complete non-starter for four years until Biden lost control of the narrative.
Well, no. The courts struck down Trump’s Tiktok ban because he used an executive order that overstepped his authority.
Because executive order was the only way to get it done - other methods would have required evidence that doesn’t exist. You’re only backing my argument lmao.
That’s the opposite of what the court said.