• Stepos Venzny@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am entirely certain that it’s the same amount of cheating as it always was and the only thing that changed is that AI is how they’re doing it.

    • gencha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      What exactly was the tool we cheated with in the past that was equivalent to LLMs? What is your certainty based on?

      • Stepos Venzny@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Other people writing it for you and the openness with which I heard many other students discussing that they weren’t writing their own stuff.

        • gencha@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Valid. I never had anyone do my assignments for free and in few minute though. It seems unreasonable to assume that this has no multiplying effect. After all, I have no hard numbers either

    • pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe. It is true that people who would have cheated in the past are now just using AI in addition to the previous means. But from my experience teaching, the number of students cheating is also increasing because of how prevalent AI has become and how easy it is to use it.

      AI has made cheating more frictionless, which means that a student who might not have say used Chegg (requires some effort) or copied a friend (requires social interaction) in the past, can now just open a textbox and get a solution without much effort. LLMs have made cheating much easier, quicker, and safer (people regularly get caught using Chegg or copying other people, AI cheating can be much harder to detect). It is a huge temptation where the [short-term] benefits can greatly dwarf the risks.