rhabarba@feddit.orgBanned to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前OpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseusmarc.infoexternal-linkmessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up1124arrow-down14
arrow-up1120arrow-down1external-linkOpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseusmarc.inforhabarba@feddit.orgBanned to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square10linkfedilink
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orgBannedOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down3·2 年前Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
minus-squarechellomere@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前For example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orgBannedOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 年前OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
For example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.