• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    And unfortunately for the CCP they fail #3

    The bill doesn’t target the CCP, it targets a US subsidiary of a Singapore-based multinational.

    unless the Chinese owners divest and all Chinese centralization for the company gets shut down

    A rule that applies exclusively to the US subsidiary of TikTok.

    It would be akin to passing a law that says @finitebanjo must have all of his possessions seized in the next nine months, because he took money from the Canadian government. Canada isn’t the target of the legislation and the scope of the legislation isn’t universal - it’s only assigning a punishment to a single domestic resident - and entirely on the grounds that the current chief executive doesn’t like Justin Trudeau.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It would be akin to passing a law that states Finite Banjo’s friend Jose must no longer act as a proxy between Finite Banjo and Jose’s friend Juan, as Finite Banjo is not constitutionally protected but Jose is, or Jose must cut all contact with Juan because Finite Banjo is harming Juan.

      The fact that you think you can remove all context in an attempt to win an argument is just evidence of your inability to comprehend complexity.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It would be akin to passing a law that states Finite Banjo’s friend Jose

        Except, again, the business being penalized is the American subsidiary.

        The fact that you think you can remove all context

        The context is that the commercial assets and employees being threatened by the US government are all within US territory.