The move embodies how ads are a growing and virtually inescapable part of the TV-viewing experience—even when you’re not watching anything.

As you might have expected, LG didn’t make a big, splashy announcement to consumers or LG TV owners about this new ad format. Instead, and ostensibly strategically, the September 5 announcement was made to advertisers. LG appears to know that screensaver ads aren’t a feature that excites users. Still, it and many other TV makers are happy to shove ads into the software of already-purchased devices.

LG TV owners may have already spotted the ads or learned about them via FlatpanelsHD, which today reported seeing a full-screen ad on the screensaver for LG’s latest flagship TV, the G4. “The ad appeared before the conventional screensaver kicks in," per the website, “and was localized to the region the TV was set to.”

LG has put these ads on by default, according to FlatpanelsHD, but you can disable them in the TVs’ settings. Still, the introduction of ads during a screensaver, shown during a pause in TV viewing that some TVs use as an opportunity to show art or personal photos that amplify the space, illustrates the high priority that ad dollars and tracking have among today’s TVs—even new top-of-the-line ones.

The addition of screensaver ads that users can disable may sound like a comparatively smaller disruption as far as TV operating system (OS) ads go. But the incorporation of new ad formats into TV OSes’ various nooks and crannies is a slippery slope. Some TV brands are even centered more on ads than selling hardware. Unfortunately, it’s up to OS operators and TV OEMs to decide where the line is, including for already-purchased TVs. User and advertiser interests don’t always align, making TV streaming platforms without third-party ads, such as Apple TV, increasingly scarce gems.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh the irony. The site reporting LG’s ads wants people to remove ad blockers.

  • h54@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not only do I use pi-hole, my so called smart TV never connects to the Internet in my household. Hell, I don’t buy any smart devices period.

    • tomkatt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t use pi-hole currently, but have managed access via my router. My LG C1 has been locked down to LAN access only for a long time.

      It’s kinds great this way. Since it has an IP it doesn’t give me any bullshit about network, but no traffic escapes the home network.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Smart” devices are getting increasingly difficult to avoid in many products categories.

        Try buying a non-smart TV without going to high cost commercial/industrial models.

        • metaStatic@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          consumer TVs are so ridiculously cheap precisely because of all the smart phone home nonsense

        • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Don’t connect the wifi and use an external device. Have no issues with my now lobotomized screen.

          • talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Until they start to force you to connect to “finish” setup. I’m sure it’s only a matter of time.

            For now my new LG turns on directly to my external device and isn’t connected to the Internet. I did have to change a setting to turn on to the last input used instead of the useless home screen.

          • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Sure, as long as the device doesn’t automatically connect to open networks, and if it does, you don’t live in an apartment, or moderate density area with available open wi-fi networks in range.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They all will do within 2 years because fuck u peasants… Ain’t the free market grand?

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are some large computer monitors, depending on how big of a screen you want. There’s no smart crap in those, just DisplayPort and HDMI inputs.

          • reshuffle6655@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Depends on your definition of large; I’ve got an amazing 48" 4k 120hz OLED monitor that does no “smart” features.

            Alienware does a 55" that I think is the largest available rn though I can’t vouch for the inclusion or lack of ads or smart features.

              • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yea I’ve got a 65" OLED with Dolby Vision. I’d have a hard time going back to anything else. But why even worry about smart features at all when an offline TV is effectively the same as a monitor anyway for less money and more entertainment specific features.

              • reshuffle6655@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Totally fair, makes sense. Didn’t want to presume lol. I don’t have a space big enough for something that large but maybe one day haha. Hopefully by then they’ll be making gaming oled monitors that big. I have purchased some cheaper smart tvs for work that are 75 or 77 inches and man, the size is crazy. Those are cheap LEDs though iirc, cost less than my 55" oled tv.

      • normalexit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thank you daddy capitalism.

        I hope I can continue to make the smart TV dumb by never giving it network access. When that fails I’ll have to hope the pihole handles some of it. The other fun option might be to put it on a VPN in the EU and hope that it enables some gdpr options.

        Either way you’re right, it’s likely inevitable.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          EU vpn is cute but it is still feeding the parasite.

          Best TV is the TV that never touched the internet. It ruins their entire business model 🐸

          Peasants will never get ahead unless we start obstructing this bullshit.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      To which remaining TV brands? They’re all gonna do this kinda stuff.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Unfortunately LG makes the best panels, and many other brands use LG panels(not as good as what LG puts in their own units).

      The solution here is to buy their ad subsidized tv and never connect it to the internet.

    • gerbler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      The fact that shrink-wrapped agreements aren’t automatically void worldwide is a fucking abomination. No you shouldn’t get to push a legally binding contract on me after I paid for the product. It’s my property now and if you want to require a license agreement after the sale then I should be able to decline it for a full refund fuck you.

  • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I pirated for a long time, and even though I had(have) large media libraries and the home server capacity to manage everything just fine, I stopped.

    Not sure when, or why, I’m guessing a service broke and I just said fuck it, I already have Prime+Netflix, and that was years ago at this point.

    Netflix’s password policy and Amazon showing adds had me spin them up again, and even migrate over to Jellyfin because Plex is just another enshitified privacy nightmare.

    Which was a pleasant surprise, because the last I tried Jellyfin years ago, it was not worth the hassle. Also, Plex wasn’t nearly as bad as it is now.

    To swing this back around to this article, I’m betting eventually they’ll force their TVs online by disabling features, capabilities, or even the device itself, if it’s not phoning home.

  • Jin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Disconnect your TV from internet. They are slow & limited, have ads and a lot of data harvesting.

    Get an Android device that faster and give you more control (not firestick etc.)

    • quixotic120@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      As if android tv isn’t also loaded to hell with ads and reliant on streaming networks that basically all have increasingly obtrusive ads

      Either only buy physical or pirate all of your media, set up a jellyfin server, set up a dns server that blocks ads (adguard, pihole) and point any device that can connect to the internet at it. Cancel all of your streaming subscriptions and use a coreelec box to watch your media from your jellyfin server. There are literally no other ways to not get obtrusive advertising.

      If you have an lg webos tv like me you can keep it connected to the internet but root it, block updates in homebrew channel, install YouTube with adblocking and sponsor block, and then again make sure it’s getting dns from your ad block server. Add in custom rules for

      us.ad.lgsmartad.com us.info.lgsmartad.com ngfts.lge.com lgad.cjpowercast.com edgesuite.net us.rdx2.lgtvsdp.com us.info.lgsmartad.com us.ibs.lgappstv.com us.lgtvsdp.com ad.lgappstv.com smartshare.lgtvsdp.com ibis.lgappstv.com us.ad.lgsmartad.com lgad.cjpowercast.com.edgesuite.net ngfts.lge.com yumenetworks.com smartclip.net smartclip.com

      snu.lge.com su.lge.com lgtvonline.lge.com

      These block ads and the last three block the update servers. The update blocking isn’t strictly necessary if you have rooted and blocked updates in homebrew channel but it will get rid of the annoying “new version” nag that pops up when you turn on the tv. You may have to clear caches on the tv

        • quixotic120@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          What kind of tv? For webos it’s potentially a bit complicated but also potentially stupid easy depending on which version of webos your tv has

          https://www.webosbrew.org/rooting/

          I would strongly suggest avoiding nvm even if it’s supported unless you’re very comfortable with hardware hacks. The others are all software and fairly easy to do if you’re capable with following instructions. The most recent, dejavuln, is fairly simple but can be a bit finicky (you may have to try a bunch of times) but lg is also rolling out patches for it so if your tv is updated you may be out of luck. It’s hard to say because the patches aren’t rolled out unilaterally. Webos is a bit confusing and there are many “branches” that all have similar features but wildly different numbering. If your tv is patched block updates by either disconnecting from the internet or blocking the above sites in your router and watch the webos homebrew discord (linked on that site). There are people actively researching new exploits and if one pops up it’ll be discussed in the discord first (and if it’s a big deal, like they expect it to be patched, they usually ping everyone to let them know to do it asap)

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      We’re 5 years from someone proposing “smartwall displays” where the entire wall is your display. No more messy cables or creaky mounting brackets. They’ll, of course also have removed the on/off button and you won’t get to control the volume, but just think of the stimulation!

      Fahrenheit 451’s technology just around the corner of the next shitty planned community coming soon near you.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It wasn’t that long ago that “smart mirrors” were en vogue, which was just a display with a reflective coating.

        Although I think that they generally fell out of fashion because people don’t want a contraption for their mirror that they have to plug in and set up.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Anything other than the native TV experience. I use a Nvidia shield personally.

      It’s not perfect but at least I don’t get ads for anything other than a few Disney shows in a small bar

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I bought an Apple TV and it’s pretty damned good to be honest. I’m still rocking the native experience on my bedroom TV but this sounds like that’s going to have to change.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    You guys are going about this all wrong. All you gotta do is connect your smart tv to the internet. Don’t use pihole. Let your tv communicate exactly how it wants to. Then buy some DVDs of local indy pro wrestling. The kind where women staple each other with staple guns, and smash light tubes over each others heads and bleed profusely.

    Now…why would you do this? Because advertisers HATE advertising with pro wrestling. They also have nothing TO advertise for women with bloody faces, and broken noses.

    Let THAT data get back to them. Who’s going to advertise to the guy who watches pro-wrestling from a high school gym where women leave pools of blood on the ground??? If everyone did this, for 10 hours a day, advertisers would deem the American market not worth the money to advertise to.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure, waste electricity while being unable to use the TV as intended, and cause some additional wear & tear. Great idea.

    • daddy32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This plays with the idea of data poisoning for the advertisers. Maybe there are some actual practical options for this regarding TVs. The idea was already implemented on PCs for example in the form of browser extension - Ad Nauseam by some professor lady. Maybe it could be expanded upon in the context of TVs.

  • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    If I’m not watching it, my TV stays off. But for how long anymore, I wonder…

    Side thought: the smartphone ROMs/roots scene has slowed down, recently; maybe it’s time to start with TVs rooting.

    • hobovision@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      One of the concerns I would have with custom ROMs for TVs is that I think a lot of the image processing magic that makes the image look good on these high end displays is done in some proprietary method that the custom ROM wouldn’t be able to use. Either in software or in hardware.

      The magic of the high end TVs isn’t actually in the panel itself as much as in the driving of the panel.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Where are all the hackers out there that have the skills to crack a TV to load something open source? They’re computers. There has to be a way to jailbreak/root then.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure, it’s being done. Xiaomi TVs have custom ROMs available, and I’m sure a bunch of others. Thing is, state of the art TVs are are not exactly cheap, and you need one to hack it in the first place. Most hackers do it for free, so they can’t exactly go on a spending spree.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They don’t cost much more than a flagship phone, which are the best supported in custom roms while cheaps ones are barely.

        Guess it’s more an issue of hundreds of ARM chipsets with proprietary drivers.

  • sibachian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    well this sucks. i’m on my 4th LG TV because I can’t stand the quality from other brands; but when the choice is ads vs picture quality, i’ll take the inferior quality every single time. fuck ads.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sony makes teevees from lg and Sammy panels… I think they are slightly better privacy ads wise but few hundred bucks more than similar models from manufacturers

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    My TV is probably going to kick the bucket in a year or two at most. Filtering “non smart TVs” on a site like BestBuy shows only commercial display options at this point.

    Are there any well maintained projects out there that are able to replace the firmware on newer smart TVs to get rid of these features? I really just want a dumb display with an input for a Chromecast with CEC support (or similar device if Google decides to enshittify that platform with screensaver ads too).

      • ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Last tv i bought wouldn’t let you set it up without connecting to the internet. Guess we’ll need open hardware tvs next if they don’t aleady exist

        • Rubanski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Couldn’t you theoretically set it up and afterwards unplug the wifi adapter? Edit: obviously the one inside the tv and not the router

          • ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I just returned it, but my idea was a separate VLAN and block all connections except for whitelisted ones for streaming. Smart tvs/rokus/etc do a lot of talking and they could theoretically brick themselves if there isn’t an internet connection available.

            The future is a wonderful place!

            • Pika@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              rokus will DoS your DNS servers if you block their telemetry, I had to disable most logging on my pihole due to that because I was getting 2 or 3 gigs worth of DNS daily logging which was almost fully the sole roku Premier upstairs. It’s so bad.

      • elrik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Probably the best idea I guess as long as you can set the TV up without Internet.

      • Eiri@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        For now. I suspect some evil person will eventually think of baking in default ads for when it can’t connect to the network to get new ones.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the best way forward would be a single board computer that can do an open source equivalent to chromecasting. Plug that in and leave your TV unconnected to the network.

      You can’t do chromecast directly, because Google holds encryption keys for it. Unfortunately, this means casting apps need to be modified to support it.

      There’s a few projects like this:

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you want a Chromecast, why not just buy a TV that runs on Google TV (Android) instead?