• brie@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    No. I didn’t mean to attack you in particular in any way. I apologize if it came off as such. I just dislike the blind copying of what Google and Facebook do. Docker is another atrocity that everyone seems to feel obligated to use.

    Heroku supports moderately large amounts of requests. It’s less expensive than having a proper sysops team in most cases.

    With 1,400 it’s probably worth it to move away from AWS. Something like self-hosted Triton (descendant of Solaris) cluster would be far more elegant than kube and lxc.

    • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Apology accepted, and thank you for not name calling.

      And yeah, if you can save the ops team salaries by picking Heroku, then it certainly might offset the costs.

      When you talk about Triton, do you mean this? Because funnily enough one of their bigger features seems to be that you can run Kubernetes on top of it. It looks pretty cool though, but I must say it was quite hard to find proper info on it.

      Triton also seem to push for containerization quite heavily, and especially Docker… So when you talk about Triton are you suggesting to use the Infrastructure Containers or Virtual Machines instead?

      • brie@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Triton and SmartOS are still Sun Microsystems people. Solaris zones preceded Linux containers by almost a decade. They lost the popularity contest, so they have to provide compatibility with kube and docker. I think infrastructure containers are zones with extra whistles.

        For even better performance, I’d go with Xen and Linux unikernel. The startup time can be just 1s with such minimum overhead. It also greatly reduces the attack surface. I highly doubt you’ll be allowed for such a drastic change though.

        • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          My team is constantly looking for new technologies to make sure we’re not turning ourselves into dinosaurs. We all know that Kubernetes won’t last forever, something better will come along some day.

          That being said I don’t really see the full value of Triton or Xen with unikernels… They might have a bit less performance overhead if used correctly, but then again Kubernetes on bare metal also has very little overhead.

          Kubernetes is certainly comes with a learning curve, and you need to know how to manage it, but once you have Kubernetes there’s a ton of nifty benefits that appear due to the thriving community.

          Need to autoscale based on some kind of queue? Just install the Keda helm chart

          Running in the cloud and want the cluster to autoscale the nodes? Just install cluster-autoscaler helm chart

          Want to pick up all of your logs and ship them somewhere? Just install the promtail helm chart

          Need a deployment tool? Just install the ArgoCD helm chart

          Need your secrets injected from some secret management solution? Just install the external-secrets helm chart

          Need to vulnerability scan all the images you are using in your cluster? Just install the trivy-operator helm chart

          Need a full monitoring stack? Just install the kube-prometheus-stack helm chart

          Need a logging solution? Just install the loki helm chart

          Need certificates? Just install the cert-manager helm chart

          The true benefit of Kubernetes isn’t Kubernetes itself, but all the it’s and pieces the community has made to add value to Kubernetes.