• franpoli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    While shifting to Rust might be a good idea for improving safety and performance, adopting the MIT license represents a fundamental change that will enable large tech companies to develop and distribute proprietary software based on the new MIT-licensed Core Utilities. This shift moves away from the original vision of the project which was to ensure that the software remains free and open as enshrined in the GPL’s copyleft principles. The permissive nature of the MIT license also will increase fragmentation, as it allows proprietary forks that diverge from the main project. This could weaken the community-driven development model and potentially lead to incompatible versions of the software.

    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If this happened, would Ubuntu based operating systems be impacted as well? I might start to learn Debian or LMDE if so.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        MIT license is still open source, so Ubuntu based operating systems can still be open source. The problem is that this makes it less needed that they have to be. However most current projects will probably stay proper open source projects and likely continue to use a better license.