ECEC@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoLiquid Treeslemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square152linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkLiquid Treeslemmy.worldECEC@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square152linkfedilink
minus-squarezeca@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agotrees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure. But the usual urban infrastructure isnt well thought out enough to exist around trees. But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist.
minus-squarePsychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months ago trees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure I think you mean all, as this reads more like “nuh uh, trees don’t ruin anything” But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist. And those are not the norm, so for places that don’t plan to just destroy what’s already there and start anew, this is an option
minus-squareKokesh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoPeople ruin nature’s infrastructure
trees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure. But the usual urban infrastructure isnt well thought out enough to exist around trees. But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist.
I think you mean all, as this reads more like “nuh uh, trees don’t ruin anything”
And those are not the norm, so for places that don’t plan to just destroy what’s already there and start anew, this is an option
People ruin nature’s infrastructure