I’ve been working on a browser-based decision tool called JuryNow.

You submit a question with binary options (yes/no or A/B): it could be a moral dilemma, fashion choice (you can upload 2 images), or big life decision, a political poll, or maybe you want a global objective perspective on a family argument?

You will receive your verdict in 3 minutes

While you wait 3 minutes, you “pay” with JuryDuty, anonymously vote on other people’s questions. There is no commentary, no discussion or debate, just a binary verdict.

Then you get your own verdict: 12 strangers from around the world give you a decision. Just human input , fast and anonymous.

It’s free to try, and no sign-up is needed. You can also play a round of JuryDuty to get the idea.

would love to hear your feedbac! (gently does it, I’m a 58F and this is my first game which has taken me 16 years from idea to MVP!)

👉 https://www.jurynow.appbut/ as it’s a brand new MVP and i have just launched, if there are less than 13 people playing, your verdict will be simulated, but this is just a temporary feature which I need to demonstrate JuryNow’s functionality and it will be permanently dismantled as soon as there are regular players across different time zones!

    • ratatouille@feddit.orgEnglish
      0·
      7 days ago

      Allow to skip and answer an altwrnat answer. (if the questioner wish that.) otherwise allow to answer standard excuse like:

      • Please think further, this are not the only options
      • I do not understand the Question
      • You need a better help than a crowd can give you
      • JuryNow@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
        0·
        7 days ago

        Thank you Ratatouile! There is currently a REPORT button, but indeed, i really see a high priority need clearly for SKIP! Do you think it would be confusing to have it as a Joker Card that you can play once (to skip) or does it just need a SKIP button (that you can only use once)

        • quill_pusher@lemmy.worldEnglish
          0·
          7 days ago

          Why not just allow unlimited skips, but make it so that you have to respond to 6 in total before you can see your results?

        • ratatouille@feddit.orgEnglish
          0·
          7 days ago

          I think people should not be forced to answer. Cause answers should be well answered. I think questionairs should see how many skiped the answer until 12 answer could got, to get an idea how difficult their question was. may add a timout for around 7s for the skip button so people are confronted and could not avoid it to fast.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        0·
        7 days ago

        Yeah I think allowing a write in answer is too risky. You will end up with 12 unique text answers otherwise.

        I do like the idea of the equivalent of an open verdict. Which is probably a mix of options 1 and 3 from your list. If you don’t believe either of the provided options are suitable and you don’t want to skip then this option would be a nice thing.