I’ve been working on a browser-based decision tool called JuryNow.

You submit a question with binary options (yes/no or A/B): it could be a moral dilemma, fashion choice (you can upload 2 images), or big life decision, a political poll, or maybe you want a global objective perspective on a family argument?

You will receive your verdict in 3 minutes

While you wait 3 minutes, you “pay” with JuryDuty, anonymously vote on other people’s questions. There is no commentary, no discussion or debate, just a binary verdict.

Then you get your own verdict: 12 strangers from around the world give you a decision. Just human input , fast and anonymous.

It’s free to try, and no sign-up is needed. You can also play a round of JuryDuty to get the idea.

would love to hear your feedbac! (gently does it, I’m a 58F and this is my first game which has taken me 16 years from idea to MVP!)

👉 https://www.jurynow.appbut/ as it’s a brand new MVP and i have just launched, if there are less than 13 people playing, your verdict will be simulated, but this is just a temporary feature which I need to demonstrate JuryNow’s functionality and it will be permanently dismantled as soon as there are regular players across different time zones!

  • Captain Janeway@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    There should only be 12 jurors (maybe you’ve already done this). People should have to wait in a queue to join a jury of 12. Once you have 12 you all vote within 30 seconds. Everyone should see the results. If a jury is a hung jury, it ends up back in the queue. Majority wins. Users can only appeal once.

    Basically it should mimic jury duty a little more closely. Right now, it just feels like you’re doing a survey.