Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast … as it gets better, we’ll become too dependent.

“all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,”

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s a huge amount of electricity even at it’s lowest. Are they building the AI to crypto mine is also another question. I could see these sneaky bastards combining the two somehow.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was thinking how it probably helps by getting into nanoseconds with buying and selling stocks. I have found that there are very few coincidences with huge technologies, tons of cash pouring in and dark money. I could be wrong though.

        • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Trading has nothing to do with cryptocurrency mining. Also, any high-frequency trading firm worth their salt is using FPGAs for the things where performance really counts.

    • Loduz_247@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      As for OpenAI and Microsoft, they’re betting on energy with a company called Helion Energy. They say they’ll have it ready by 2028. Whether they’ll achieve that? We’ll see.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I looked that up and it’s a fusion reactor, apparently, from what I can figure out from their nigh-illegible website.

        …[reads further] …

        It skips the steam cycle. That’s fucking cool. I really hope they get it working.

            • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              there’s lots of handwavy things. They even said they “discovered new physics” to explain some disappointing (perfectly predictable, by other established nuclear physicists) results. “Oh the physics equation was wrong, we just need to make everything 25% bigger”.

              Also, the emitted radiation levels will be insane once it’s scaled up