kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoJava at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comexternal-linkmessage-square124linkfedilinkarrow-up1376arrow-down115cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1361arrow-down1external-linkJava at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comkirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square124linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoOOP makes so much sense. What happened?
minus-squareAnti-Antidote@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·1 year agoThe AbstractionBubbleFactory popped
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoAbstractionBubbleBuilderFactoryStrategyImplementation mind you
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoMany people increasingly find that using functional patterns enables them to build more reliable software.
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI don’t think OOP is as bad as many people make it out to be. It’s perfectly fine in moderation. The problem is that it can lead to over engineered applications when abused.
OOP makes so much sense. What happened?
The AbstractionBubbleFactory popped
AbstractionBubbleBuilderFactoryStrategyImplementation mind you
Many people increasingly find that using functional patterns enables them to build more reliable software.
I don’t think OOP is as bad as many people make it out to be. It’s perfectly fine in moderation.
The problem is that it can lead to over engineered applications when abused.