kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Java at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comexternal-linkmessage-square124linkfedilinkarrow-up1376arrow-down115cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1361arrow-down1external-linkJava at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comkirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square124linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 年前OOP makes so much sense. What happened?
minus-squareAnti-Antidote@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·1 年前The AbstractionBubbleFactory popped
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 年前AbstractionBubbleBuilderFactoryStrategyImplementation mind you
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 年前Many people increasingly find that using functional patterns enables them to build more reliable software.
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前I don’t think OOP is as bad as many people make it out to be. It’s perfectly fine in moderation. The problem is that it can lead to over engineered applications when abused.
OOP makes so much sense. What happened?
The AbstractionBubbleFactory popped
AbstractionBubbleBuilderFactoryStrategyImplementation mind you
Many people increasingly find that using functional patterns enables them to build more reliable software.
I don’t think OOP is as bad as many people make it out to be. It’s perfectly fine in moderation.
The problem is that it can lead to over engineered applications when abused.