• Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didnt they then post a link showing that dall-e could combine two different things into something its never seen before?

      Did you read the whole comment? Even if the text model describing things is irrelevant the dall-e part is not.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m sorry if I’m not buying your defense of CSAM.

          Thanks for making it clear you’re either arguing in bad faith, or that you’re incapable of talking about actual issues the moment anyone mentions CSAM.

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Im sorry? My defense of CSAM?

          What defence of CSAM?

          Do you require mental assistance? You appear to be having some kind of aneurism…

    • papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The original comment said it’s impossible for a model to be able to produce CP if it was never exposed to it.

      They were uninformed, so as someone who works with machine learning I informed them. If your argument relies on ignorance it’s bad.

      Re: text model, someone already addressed this. If you’re going to make arguments and assumptions about things I share without reading them, there’s no need for me to bother with my time. You can lead a horse to water but you cant make it drink.

      Have a good one!