

Bitsocial is very similar to bittorrent and inspired by bittorrent
You can’t upload media directly
Inspired by a media sharing protocol so you can not share media… 😖


Bitsocial is very similar to bittorrent and inspired by bittorrent
You can’t upload media directly
Inspired by a media sharing protocol so you can not share media… 😖


Great idea. Automatic updates (e.g. Watchtower) make me a little nervous.


If the parental control comes from the social media site itself then it’s likely the parent that’s being controlled. The most important control is limiting screen time and not every site allows parents to set hard limits.


Sounds like it would be actively used so I wouldn’t go without a powered adapter or hub. I struggled for months with an external adapter that would work 90% of the time but suddenly unmount at the worst times.


Today it’s for CSAM. Tomorrow it could be for saying anything negative about dear leader. Our Constitution clearly won’t protect us.
I love asking new hires about ORMs. If they don’t have anything bad to say about them I know they’ve never used them.


Installing. We just call it installing.


They already showed their hand. Doesn’t matter if they’ve backed down. My new phone is going to use GrapheneOS and if this shit trickles down (Graphene is still based on Android) I’m going full Linux phone.


You could almost say it’s like being put into an oven.


Nice. I used Splinter Cell to mod mine.


It’s been this way for decades. Productivity gains largely go towards profits, not wages.
https://www.statista.com/chart/23410/inequality-in-productivity-and-compensation/


You might also consider linuxbrew as well, depending on your goals. AFAIK it’s almost the same as native but with better separation of dependencies.


Oh, no! Not Meta! Or Oracle! Or umm, Palantir! Or… guys, help me here.


It’s usually fine code but it just doesn’t follow the same conventions and flow. It’s kind of like reading a novel typed in block letters written in 3rd person then suddenly it’s cursive letters and 1st person.


Seniors reviewing code is fine but only when, as someone else mentioned, the code writer is learning from the review. The AI doesn’t learn at all and the Jr Dev probably learns very little because they didn’t understand the original code. Reviewing AI code often turns into me rewriting most of it.


I always say I’m not interested in asking an LLM to add 2 + 2 for me. Of course my managers are always pushing us to use LLMs and coworkers keep suggesting we replace efficient, testable, and consistent processes with AI. If you’re going to use it at least think of scenarios that are hard to code for and it would take you at least 10 min to solve.


Junior and mid-level engineers will now require more senior engineers to sign off any AI-assisted changes, Treadwell added.
So instead of getting a human to write it and AI peer reviewing it you want the most expensive per hour developers to look at stuff a human didn’t write and the other engineers can’t explain? Yeah, this is where the efficiency gains disappear.
I read stuff from one of my Jr’s all the time and most of it is made with AI. I don’t understand most of it and neither does the Dev. He keeps saying how much he’s learned from AI but peer programming with him is the pits. I try to say stuff like, “Oops! Looks like we forgot the packages.” And then 10 secs of silence later, “So you can go to line 24 and type…”
Not sure the best place to discuss peace and love is at a Nazi rally.