Hiker, software engineer (primarily C++, Java, and Python), Minecraft modder, hunter (of the Hunt Showdown variety), biker, adoptive Akronite, and general doer of assorted things.

  • 1 Post
  • 735 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 10th, 2023

help-circle

  • Yeah, I think I’m going to stick to my energizers … pretty much everything I use AA batteries for these days is a low draw device (door lock, smoke detector) or something like an emergency flash light, rechargeable batteries don’t make sense for either use case.

    I have some old school nice rechargeable batteries as well with an external charger. Those were nice back in 2016 when my bose headphones I was using at the time used AAA batteries, but it’s been a long time since I’ve used those with any frequency.






  • Yeah, it looks like basic reasoning but it isn’t. These things are based on pattern recognition. “Assume all x are y, all z are y, are all z x?” is a known formulation … I’ve seen it a fair number of times in my life.

    Recent development has added this whole “make it prompt itself about the question” phase to try and make things more accurate … but that also only works sometimes.

    AI in LLM form is just a sick joke. It’s like watching a magic trick where half of people expect the magician to ACTUALLY levitate next year because … “they’re almost there!!”

    Maybe I’ll be proven wrong, but I don’t see it…


  • I don’t buy the “it’s a neural network” argument. We don’t really understand consciousness or thinking … and consciousness is possibly a requirement for actual thinking.

    Frankly, I don’t think thinking in humans is based anywhere near statical probabilities.

    You can of course apply statistics and observe patterns and mimic them, but coorilation is not causation (and generally speaking, society is far too willing to accept coorilation).

    Maybe everything reduces to “neural networks” in the same way LLM AI models them … but that seems like an exceptionally bold claim for humanity to make.


  • I actually did try rock climbing, my ex and I did it.

    I proposed going to first time we dated, she got into it while we were split, I would go a few times a month with her, and then basically haven’t been in a few months since we split.

    The climbing gym in my area is on the other side of town and just constantly PACKED and I was also never very good at it … plus I’m colorblind and the routes are color coded which makes it even trickier … so it’s not really my cup of tea.

    But yeah, I’ve done it probably 15 times or so and have my own shoes.

    I’ll probably give it another shot (this time with friends) once it gets cold again (I’m in NE Ohio).


  • Yeah … I appreciate the effort but I don’t think that’s a real answer.

    I don’t want to date half way across the country or world … or slide into other people’s DMs (which is something girls ALSO complain about dudes doing).

    At that point if the answer is “someone’s going to be possibly uncomfortable anyways” I’m better off just doing the cold approach where I can at least read body language.

    Not to mention there are a ton of elements of attraction that just don’t work on a forum.



  • I really think we just need to move on from this AI craze.

    We don’t have a general intelligence. We may never have a general intelligence.

    Keep using AI for what it’s good for: statistics based decision making. Stop trying to use AI for designing solutions; it’s not built for that because that requires reasoning which is something AI cannot do no matter how much snake oil society has been sold.

    You want to use it for generating a picture, a poem, or a song … fine, it’s at least good at that because it doesn’t have to solve anything using facts, making stuff up IS the goal.


  • Honestly my biggest problem is:

    • I don’t drink
    • I don’t go to church / I’m not religious
    • I work from home
    • Video games and hiking are my two major “for fun” time expenditures
    • I’ve seen too many women complain about dudes approaching them
    • I hung out in a local coffee shop and met a couple of people, but no women (half the time if there were any there they seemed either much younger or much older … the other half of the time they’d show up and never come back so a cold approach was the only option)

    … what the hell am I supposed to do other than use these apps society?





  • Yeah for me, it’s the variety of tales that you author. Every game feels a bit like a new adventure, after a while similar to ones you’ve been on before, but still new.

    ARC has those elements, but something feels off so far for me…

    Also typically the progression is in terms of variety (Roguelike) instead of straight power (Roguelite). That keeps things fair because even a new player, if they trade the aim, can pose a real threat to a seasoned player of similar FPS skill. ARC seems like it’s decided to go for a sort of Roguelite experience and that seems risky.


  • I haven’t played Marathon, but I did get into the ARC test. This will mostly be some ramblings…

    I’m still waiting to play ARC with some friends. I only did some solo stuff.

    I’m coming from this as a big Hunt Showdown player (1,200+ hours) and someone that’s played a bit of Forever Winter (~20). I still like Hunt better; I think it’s the only extraction shooter that didn’t take a ton of influence from Tarkov.

    I wasn’t crazy about the marathon art style, but I’m not ready to pass judgement on it until I’ve been in the world.

    ARC’s art style I found beautiful but also perhaps too sparse. There were so many wide open spaces … I just don’t see that being a good thing for an extraction shooter. The world felt vast and empty … I prefer Hunt’s more cluttered and dense design.

    ARC does seem to have a lot of potential in like how it’s designed its AI, Hunt’s is very primitive in a lot of ways and kind of secondary. I think the AI is going to be a bigger deal in ARC.

    Third person also feels worse to me than first person. I hope they add a first person mode to ARC, but I kind of doubt they will.

    I definitely agree that ARC felt like it was being set up to tell a story and felt very cinematic at times.

    The UI also felt like the best extraction shooter UI I’ve ever encountered.

    I’m concerned about the long term health of ARC. The progression system seems like it will certainly lead to established players dominating newer players. The lack of a primary objective that’s shared by all the teams on the map … I’m not sure how I feel about that. On the one hand, it may lead to a more relaxed experience, on the other hand, it doesn’t curate players towards each other like Hunt does; it seems looting and crafting are the primary motivators instead.

    The fights that I did get into, they lacked the complex environment and buildings in Hunt so I didn’t find them nearly as engaging, they were much more straight forward gunfights than leveraging the map to use it to my advantage. I think that aspect will ultimately hurt the game as it makes it feel like a bit of a generic shooter.

    Overall ARC felt very middle of the road from what I’ve played of it so far. I had a similar feeling about The Finals. Embark seems like a talented studio and I wish them the best as they go up against Bungie and Crytek.


  • I mean, I’ve seen a growing number of companies looking for Salesforce; it’s even worse (all of your code only works on their platform because it’s a proprietary language AND they charge for things as absurd as how many lines of code you have).

    A lot of the things that you can’t do with serverless expressed in this article are not things you want to do on a web server anyways. Like writing a temporary file, sharing state in process between requests, or spawning a thread.

    Sure for a truly small workload where you don’t have to worry about abuse and scaling beyond one machine you can get away with that stuff. However, for companies that do need to be able to deal with multiple machine workloads and don’t want to worry about hiring a team of engineers to implement a scalable cloud or run their own physical hardware in a data center … I think serverless likely has some value.