did I use worktree the wrong way? the subfolder with the repository where the worktree was placed, has to be recompiled anyway?

thanks for elaborating. will give it a try :)

Hmmm. Thanks. I might try it out another time soon:).

Why using a worktree? I will simply commit my WIP modifications on the dev branch.

Switch branch to work on the bugfix. And when Im finished I move back to the development branch? Why is this worse than doing this worktree stuff?

I did my part.

Omg i can feel this xkcd

Omg this exists already?

Well you havent seen my corporation then…

This is just a casual reminder to read the article before replying in the comments.

This should anyway be a sticky to every post about third party content.

Drugs are literally the thing that you can buy and make you happy.

We are still in c/technology

Great game guys.

Finished it.

It kicked something in me. Ive even had a dream about it.

For now i keep distance to such sort of things.

guess you have to launch your first 20 or 30 probes at the space stage

Wdym? I ve had 1000 launched manually. Haha

Its always something isnt it?

I too had issues with some stuff at first. But until I dive into org mode its the best i was getting.

(Im telling this from stumbling through many apps like tiddlywiki, obsidian, joplin, qownnotes, trilliumnotes, standardnotes, and probably more)

Or logseq which is open source.

Or joplin. Or a meriad of other apps

Oh my god. Why.

Why.

Its monday and you give me that?

Thanks satan.

Edit: 7th dimension wuhu

I was fucking around with my windows pc.

And then i found out that you can fuck more around in linux, and that was the story of my first ubuntu iso burned on a cd.

I had no clue about anything but was blown away by something “different”

Ok.right in the feels.

To be honest, I try to search before on stackoverflow most of the time, due to the ability to write a few keywords and get a suitable answer versus formulate a prompt for the LLM.

But on the other side, llms are used for so much bullshit and invaluable prompts that my questions for helping me in my job has a more worthwile argument.

But of course it is a problematic topic related to llms.

My snippets are basically taken care of now by chatgpt.

Indeed. And I am more curious about whats possible instead of missing the good old days.

Nobody can argue that a 1950 movie is better as a marvel multi million production.

Even watching movies from the late 90s -2000s is a time travel and I assume most of the “good old movies” is of nostalgic origin

However nothing that cant be done by modern movies.

lifeless and boring

Do you have an example for that?

To me modern productions are putting so much effort in side story/side character building that it gets complex.

Also that nowadays a good movie lasts 3 hours. Instead of the good old 90 minutes.