Good point

My new Hyundai did this, sorta, and it also had to be recalled. Shifting into reverse would immediately display the rear view camera (good) but then about 25% of the time it would flash a dialogue box on top of the display with instructions on how to operate the display (bad). You could select “Dismiss” or “Don’t Show This Again”. Selecting “Don’t show This Again” did nothing (worse). With the dialog present you could not see the rear view camera display and if you are one of many drivers with muscle memory, the car was already rolling backwards when you realize you cannot see (unacceptable).

Elon sucks and I would never buy a Tesla but just adding this as a reference point that software in cars generally sucks.

He’s a great developer but he needs to find a way not to be so reliant on giant tech companies to make his apps viable.

Do you both have the same type of phone?

Indeed. They discovered that:

shit in = shit out.

I think he had no god dammed idea what he was doing and still doesn’t.

Sir, this is a Wendy’s.

No but that was a similar story that came out at the same time. I think I may be thinking about the Cruise vehicles.

But didn’t it come out recently that Waymo has human “drivers” behind a remote control and that it is nearly a 1:1 relationship of driver to car because the self driving tech just hasn’t made it far enough?

I’m Bridges certified as well as in Cloverleaf, which we also use. FHIR is great but it doesn’t require much in the way of integration engineers.

I’m an integration guy at my roots but I lead a variety of different teams at the moment. We use Corepoint as one of our interface engines and it shat the bed big time. We had to restore it from backup, which was nuts in my opinion. We had a variety of apps impacted.

This is pretty much correct. I work in an Epic shop and we had about 150 servers to remediate and some number of workstations (I’m not sure how many). While Epic make not have been impacted, it is a highly integrated system and when things are failing around it then it can have an impact on care delivery. For example if a provider places a stat lab order in Epic, that lab order gets transmitted to an integration middleware which then routes it to the lab system. If the integration middleware or the lab system are down, then the provider has no idea the stat order went into a black hole.

No they want the NYT to demonstrate that it actually wrote the articles.

The article states nothing of that though.

My phone asked me first.

Whatever. Just track their warp signatures.

So it’s okay then.

You would think otherwise by your username.

You probably did/do consent at some point, but nobody reads the fine print.

Challenger’s hardware was flown in out of spec conditions.