When you say those words do you imagine normal people reading this and not laughing

The deeper I get into this platform the more I realize the guise of being ‘progressive, left, privacy-conscious, tech inclined’ is literally the opposite.

??? So why don’t we get better at making energy than get scared about using a renewable resource. Fuck it let’s just go back to the printing press.

Amazing to me how stuff like this gets upvoted on a supposedly progressive platform.

Now this is something I can get behind. But I was talking about the decision to retaliate in the first place.

Why?? Please make this make sense. Having AI to help with coding is ideal and the greatest immediate use case probably. The web is an open resource. Why die on this stupid hill instead of advocating for a privacy argument that actually matters?

Edit: Okay got it. Hinder significant human progress because a company I don’t like might make some more money from something I said in public, which has been a thing literally forever. You guys really lack a lot of life skills about how the world really works huh?

deleted by creator

For the instruments I have a private plugin originally based on spleeter and I have LALAL.ai. Some tracks (like the drums) which it’s not as good for, I get my buddy to extract in FL studio (its implementation is surprisingly not terrible) since I use ableton. Sometimes the result is good, sometimes it’s not. There’s only so much you can pull out of these old tracks but the fact we can do it at all is pretty mind-blowing.

Every instrument has been separated out and reconstructed by AI so technically it’s more of a “remaster” than most of the commercially released “remasters” of older music. Or the best we’re ever gonna get anyway. That other comment is just salty.

If you’re in doubt just listen to the new one and old one side by side - it’s not even close.

Remix with modern techniques and make a master with a lot more dynamic range and listenability than the version you’d use in a video game.

Here’s my prediction. Over the next couple decades the internet is going to be so saturated with fake shit and fake people, it’ll become impossible to use effectively, like cable television. After this happens for a while, someone is going to create a fast private internet, like a whole new protocol, and it’s going to require ID verification (fortunately automated by AI) to use. Your name, age, and country and state are all public to everybody else and embedded into the protocol.

The new ‘humans only’ internet will be the new streaming and eventually it’ll take over the web (until they eventually figure out how to ruin that too). In the meantime, they’ll continue to exploit the infested hellscape internet because everybody’s grandma and grampa are still on it.

deleted by creator

It says it won’t give it usernames, probably a hardcoded thing

I dunno man, these are awfully specific. In case it wasn’t obvious I’ve never had an interest in cricket or PL/I.

Interestingly it’s not random, whenever I ask it again it’s returning the same results for a user who’s not me (though these answers may be associated with me now)

When I do this in Bing it gives me the answers to other users’ queries.

Edge mentioned on this sub? Brave.

4000 asshole cunts

Sure. Let’s not rub each other off too hard over it though.

Windows power users? My ass. Any Windows power user knows you can just turn this shit off with group policy. I think what you mean is ‘we need something polarizing to write about hurrr’. That website is a joke.

Take your shitty garbage journalism back to buzzfeed you fucking hacks.

I mean, for some of the stuff I’ve seen here I wouldn’t even necessarily disagree with a comment like this but the OP saying advertising violates journalistic integrity has literally nothing to do with that. That’s just common sense.

In opposition to popular sentiment, good journalism actually does make money. It just doesn’t make as much money. And bad journalism without advertising makes no money.