It would help if we knew even just a smidgin of what these titles are.

deleted by creator

The key idea from the article is –

…Companies making more than $5 million annually by using Post-Open software in a paid-for product would be required to pay 1 percent of their revenue back to this administrative organization, which would distribute the funds to the maintainers of the participating open source project(s). That would cover all Post-Open software used by the organization.

My point being that they deem this serious enough to release publicly themselves instead of an internal memory, and that this is about an active threat actor rather than a mere vulnerability.

And those papers get used as training data for next iteration of AI. Reinforcement learning!

Thank you. I’ll look it up.

Mexico is suing U.S. gun makers for selling high-powered weapons that fuel drug cartel violence.

You da MVP! Thanks for sharing your experience.

Clumsy now. Give it a few years. Or months.

Slay the Spire. I probably don’t need a second.

I was thinking more of Pinky and The Brain.

Anecdotally, I am writing this comment from a 7-year-old Chromebook. Owing to software updates, it’s not as snappy as it used to be (therein lies the irony), but it’s still usable up to its Linux container. The battery is dead but I don’t want to get rid of it because the screen is still nice and bright and the hardware build is otherwise fine.

I just wish, though, I could boot proper Linux off of it and I could upgrade memory and storage.