sobuddywhoneedsyou

This somewhat makes sense in that ra w media is higher volume in terms of data. But lossy compressed images and video can still be high data-volume even if they are not raw.

The aspect that is missing from this discussion is how much it would actually cost Apple to include high wired data transfer speeds in non pro models and whether non pro models cost enough to justify including this feature even if a small fraction of users use it.

As an addendum I will share my opinion that even pro model users are not gonna use wired transfer 99.99% of the time. I feel Apple is doing this to fabricate a separation between pro and non-pro models plus boosting their bottom line. Sadly there are a bunch of people in this thread that are uncritically defending a trillion dollar corporation for reasons I cannot fathom. This is not really a topic that I’m passionate about so I’m not gonna engage in this any further.

Non pro users don’t need to transfer photos?

Why do Pro users need 3 transfer speeds?

Not everyone can spend +1000 dollars on a computer.

You could go for a used laptop

Can you tell me what was wrong with Vista? I was too green when it was released. All I remember about it is that the buttons looked (I don’t know the term for it) jelly-like instead of flat.

I think Microsoft is too reliant on advertising money for this pattern to hold true anymore. The pattern reads like superstition in the first place.

Is there something like LTSC/LTSB for Windows 11?

I have Win10LTSC installed on a separate partition for games and the thought of having to “upgrade” to Windows 11 at some point in the future is nightmare inducing.