molave

Think you’re right lol

Not necessarily “out of sand”. IP is basically putting a price tag on a person for them to say “Yes, I consent”. In other words, technofeudalism.

Crowd Strike’s Final Fantasy

The hyperbole is the point. They’re explaining that such a thing is theoretically possible.

Alternate source

Looks more like a legislative skill issue than a judicial one to me. I don’t know what is expected of the judges aside from interpreting the law.

I’m very wary of the measures that could potentially pass if the some of the anti-AI art people get their way. I know how messy and difficult putting fair-use material in YouTube can be. There would be more of that in more platforms.

I agree unregulated AI is problematic. At the same time, I’m cynical on what the actual measures would look like.

Sure. What I’m saying is, it’s like an Oxycontin salesman convincing you it’s not addictive at all.

Netflix password sharing is technically against TOS and did not enforce it until recently.

You’re technically breaking the law for going past the speed limit, but when did you last have to pay a fine for it (caveat: depends on location)?

Why don’t they program using spreadsheets? Are they stupid?

Strong “the constitution is a piece of paper” energy right there

• No longer using imgur for hosting images
• Reddit use reduced to specific communities. Former use cases are migrated to Lemmy
• Changed mobile browser to Firefox
• Using a searxng instance as my search engine

Nothing pulls its iMessage app from the Play Store following privacy disaster

i.e. something pulled its iMessage app from the Play Store following privacy disaster

They fired a certain scientific railgun. Nice.

I read it clearly, but how exactly did I enable and defend evil?

1. Hurting you by acting how?
2. Aside from “killing the rich”, how should one attack evil and break the working class’s subjugation?

What I found out is the outcomes of events like the French Revolution and the rule of the Khmer Rouge i.e. vastly different dependent on the circumstances of the place and time.

How equivalent is

“I don’t condone the killing of people simply because they make more than I do.”

to

“[condoning] the murder and enslavement of millions around the world by a small dominant group of people who have no one’s best interests at heart but their own.”?

This is partially what “eat the rich” rhetoric meant when acted on.

based