8.5 GWh / 85 MW = 100 hours, or around 4 days. If they can build it cheap enough, this is the kind of battery we would need to replace nuclear for dealing with the day-to-day variability of renewables.

Will the Mediatek modules also support VESA Adaptive Sync, or will they have fixed frame rate on AMD cards?

“We are in the late stages of having a user base”

.gov is allowed for use by any governments that invented the internet.

.us is sketchy AF. They should use something.gov.

I listed the 5 possible digits. What’s missing?

deleted by creator

IPv6 subnet masks are long, but super easy because of hexadecimal. A bunch of Fs, then [EC8]? then a bunch of 0s.

fd00::x is shorter than 192.168.x.x

Technically you’re supposed to use fdxx:xxxx:xxxx::x, but on your home network nobody cares.

Did you mean caveat emptor (buyer beware), or do you refer to Amazon as caveat emporium (the beware market)?

Roughly speaking, fd00::123 is the IPv6 equivalent of 192.168.0.123

A device on your private IPv4 network can send packets directly to 104.21.36.127 via NAT. How will it send packets to 2606:4700:3033::6815:247f? There’s not enough space in the IPv4 header.

You can statically number a LAN with fd00::/8 and NAT66 to the internet, if you really want to.

Solar PV tortillas taste awful and hurt my teeth.

These laws expose residents of Florida and Texas who edit Wikipedia to lawsuits by people who disagree with their work

If that quote it accurate, then it doesn’t matter where Wikipedia itself is based.

Ah, so he switched from smiting to torrenting. That explains a few things.

most new Android phones support > 3.0

Where do you find that information? Do you know of a reviewer that benchmarks the USB transfer rate of Android phones?

Edit: I found this: https://www.androidauthority.com/google-pixel-problem-usb-c-file-transfer-1075286/

10.8GB / 480 Mbps = 180 seconds, and those phones are all faster, so they must be using USB 3.x. In other words, iPhone 15 will have slower USB data than the Pixel 1.

In this case, disabling IPv6 is actually the right move. If the VPN provider doesn’t support IPv6, then there’s no way to allow to allow IPv6 Internet traffic without causing a leak/VPN bypass.

The right move for the VPN provider is to support IPv6. The right move for the user is to take their business to a provider that does.

Frankly I find that bot annoying. I just commented because it replied to me.

I’m mainly complaining about this:

The pipedbot issue is related, but less important.