• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Honestly, I was expecting the more standard sex jokes. The fact that they didn’t touch anything sexual makes it a high brow media affair from the west.

    Pluses in the video:

    • They could find factories to make their product at scale within 24 hours both times
    • The internet, and their high bandwidth connections, worked anywhere in the country including the countryside factories

    Minus is in the video:

    • Their luggage got lost at the airport
    • They used every type of transportation available, except the most obvious, because the art directors couldn’t resist a planes trains and automobile homage.
    • Sepia tone filter on everything
    • The hotel they booked was hilariously bad

    On the whole, I think the positives are great, the negatives are just nitpicking.

    I think I’ve seen all these minuses on other productions and other countries, it’s just traveler frustration tropes

    Also, this entire video, the travel physically going to places, could have been an email. There’s no reason they need to physically go to a factory to negotiate a contract, that’s 1970s thinking. But it makes for a good video

    • aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      As someone who has lived in Thailand, I get why Thais were pissed. The hotel, the taxi, the public transport all look like they’re from 30 years ago. Yes, you do still find run-down buildings and tuk-tuks in Bangkok today, but it’s generally a lot more developed and modern than westerners expect on first arrival. Instead of showing the reality, the creators of this ad went out of their way to portray an outdated caricature.

      To an outsider it might seem like nitpicking, but Thais are fed up with being presented this way to an international audience.