• flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’d be kinda nice if they made these kinds of changes options rather than just deciding this is best

    Could honestly take it or leave it, doesn’t really add anything

    • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      i’m not even sure it’s worth having an option. i don’t think i’d even have noticed a difference, apart from the menu button being in a slightly different place to every other gnome app. it’s fine; but it wasn’t worth the development time

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The last thing I want is an option for this. My gosh, imagine the amount of options you would end up with if every single design choice was turned into an option. Who in the world would like that many options.

        I’m happy to just have a design team work on whatever they think looks better and works best for the user experience, and implement it after some rounds of public review and testing. This looks neat enough to me - slightly less cluttered than what my current Nautilus window looks like while maintaining the same functionality.

        • s20@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who in the world would like that many options.

          KDE fans?

          Awww, Plasma fans, you know I’m playin’.

            • s20@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Seriously, I envy you guys. Every time I try to use Plasma, I end up spending all my time tweaking the desktop, and by the time I’m done, I realize I’ve just recreated the Gnome workflow…

                • s20@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, almost. I can pull it off on my desktop, but I can’t get the touchpad/touchscreen gestures to work right on my laptop.

                  Kinda looking forward to Plasma 6 to play around with, though. Might even be enough to get me to switch for a while!

              • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                every time i try to use gnome, i end up spending all my time going “dammit, where are all the bleeding features

                (also the lack of fitts’ law adherence due to that pointless bar at the top)

                • s20@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I had to look up Fitts’s law, and I’m not sure I get it. Could you explain what you mean?

                  ETA: I kinda feel like mine was about KDE not being a fit for me personally, and yours was a slam on Gnome rather than a statement of personal preference.

                  • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I had to look up Fitts’s law, and I’m not sure I get it. Could you explain what you mean?

                    basically; the speed that it takes to click a button is dependant on the size of the button and the distance from the cursor. however, buttons at the edge of the screen have effectively infinite size, as they can’t be overshot. the most used actions should be placed there, as they are the easiest to click by muscle memory (particularly the corners, as they have infinite size in both dimensions)

                    on windows, kde, cinnamon, etc.; by default the bottom left is start, the bottom right is show desktop (this one i can’t explain), and the top right is close maximised window. the top of the screen is also used for other window-related actions like minimise, restore, change csd tabs, etc.

                    gnome flouts this by having most of the top of the screen doing nothing (most of it is completely empty) apart from rarely used actions like calendar and power. and the bottom right and left doing nothing[1]

                    did i explain well?

                    ETA: I kinda feel like mine was about KDE not being a fit for me personally, and yours was a slam on Gnome rather than a statement of personal preference.

                    nah it was very much a personal thing: some people like having a minimal and clutter-free feature set; i like having as many features as possible, because then i find features i didn’t even know i liked.[2]

                    as for the top bar: this one confuses me - it just seems objectively bad. but obviously it’s not as some people clearly like it. i haven’t had anyone actually explain to me why, though


                    1. i mean they also ignore it in other ways, too ↩︎

                    2. i didn’t know how useful a terminal embedded in the file manager would be until i started using dolphin, now i can’t do without it ↩︎

              • flashgnash@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I tried KDE, it’s cool but I get the same thing of trying to recreate gnome/pantheon

                It kinda sucks in GNOME when there’s just one thing you would like to change though

                Have been trying to get a tiling window manager on GNOME but all the gnome extensions that do it kinda suck

                • s20@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Really? I’m not a tiling WM kinda guy, but I thought Forge was decent.

                  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I found it rather laggy. Maybe I should give it more of a chance just felt clunky and laggy to me (I assume because it’s superimposed ontop of GNOME not integrated into it)

                    Edit: I gave it another chance and I actually really like it thank you for calling me out on that

                    Think it was only clunky because I already had a bunch of stuff open before turning it on

    • 0000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well I just switched to KDE Plasma last week and I’m pleasantly surprised just how many things are configurable via a menu and how well it runs on Wayland With a Nvidia GPU.

      I used to despise KDE Neon, and used Gnome for a bit, but I don’t think I can go back anymore until their design philosophy changes again.

      • serratur@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope they stick to the design philosophy, having different choices in DE is a good thing.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Problem for me is KDE is dependant on configuration to get it to look nice, GNOME looks nice and works well out of the box but sucks if you want to do anything ontop of that base