return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoCyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down11
arrow-up123arrow-down1external-linkCyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square73linkfedilink
minus-squareKairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months ago“I know someone who only did a murder once and they locked them right up. Suggest you reset your opinions a bit.” Replace murder with any crime. If you don’t want to face the consequences, don’t do the action that begets the consequences. TLDR: don’t fuck around if you don’t wanna find out.
minus-squarePommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoFun fact: In the US you can get a DUI for sleeping it off in your car, a passenger drinking while you drive (open container laws), or failing a bullshit coordination test graded by a racist cop without them ever checking your blood alcohol.
minus-squareTwilitSky@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·7 months agoAlso a fun fact: you could also just not drink and drive or allow others to drink in your car.
minus-squarePommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoDo you think it’s justified to ban someone from driving for letting other people drink in the car? If so, why? What good would that achieve?
minus-squareplz1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·7 months agoNice straw man. Murder != drunk driving.
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoInterlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.
minus-squareplz1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·7 months agoI was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.
“I know someone who only did a murder once and they locked them right up. Suggest you reset your opinions a bit.”
Replace murder with any crime.
If you don’t want to face the consequences, don’t do the action that begets the consequences.
TLDR: don’t fuck around if you don’t wanna find out.
Fun fact: In the US you can get a DUI for sleeping it off in your car, a passenger drinking while you drive (open container laws), or failing a bullshit coordination test graded by a racist cop without them ever checking your blood alcohol.
Also a fun fact: you could also just not drink and drive or allow others to drink in your car.
Do you think it’s justified to ban someone from driving for letting other people drink in the car?
If so, why? What good would that achieve?
Nice straw man. Murder != drunk driving.
Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.
I was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.