It can be? You literally just download the OTA update and the vehicle installs it from your own home. “Recall” implies that you have to go into the shop but that’s simply not true.
It can be? You literally just download the OTA update and the vehicle installs it from your own home. “Recall” implies that you have to go into the shop but that’s simply not true.
I don’t think “the backup camera is a little slow to turn on” is the smoking gun you are looking for though.
We gotta stop calling software updates recalls. Yeah I get that it’s fun to bash on the Cybertruck but this isn’t really that interesting.
Now that sticky accelerator pedal… yikes.
Arguably you are the one misusing the term. Even painfully mundane tasks like the A* pathfinding algorithm fall under the umbrella of artificial intelligence. It’s a big, big (like, stupidly big) field.
You are right that it’s not AGI, but very few people (outside of marketing) claim that it is.
Locally run AI, yes. Hosted AI, no.
AI is a broader term than you might realize. Historically even mundane algorithms like A* pathfinding were considered AI.
Turns out people like to constantly redefine artificial intelligence to “whatever a computer can’t quite do yet.”
Probably to allow proper sideloading of apps, instead of the contrived bullshit they already tried to pull.
I mean, maybe that hour is a human swapping batteries and giving it a light cleaning?
Yes but it’s fucking expensive to invalidate a patent. Possibly in the millions of dollars. That’s how patent trolls succeed - it’s far cheaper to own a bad patent than to fight one.
Charging maybe? A robot’s gotta eat too.
Ironically security theater can have a a placebo effect on crime rates as well. It turns out that the likelihood that someone commits a crime is strongly correlated to the chance they believe they will get caught, not the actual chance of getting caught. That’s why fake security cameras are so effective.
Only up to the point where humans notice it. It’ll make AI images easier to detect, but still pretty for humans. Probably a win-win.
Yeah, in practice feeding AI its own outputs is totally fine as long as it’s only the outputs that are approved by users.
They clearly shit their pants when they saw everyone leave. I wonder how many developers will return. I know I won’t.
Use the time honored technique of lying on the birthdate form.
Asking that question is the first step people need in order to finally come to that conclusion. We all just completed the process a loooooong time ago.
Sure, go for it. But good luck paying an army of copywriters to summarize every article you read.
That’s not what I’m implying. What I’m saying is that wasting time and effort on quality is pointless when the threshold for success is low.
For example, I could use aerospace quality parts (perfectly machined to micron-level tolerances) to build a toaster. However, while this would not increase the performance meaningfully, the cost would be orders of magnitude greater. Instead I can use shitty off-the-shelf parts because it doesn’t really make a difference.
Maybe in other words, engineering tolerances apply to LLMs too. They’re crude devices, but it’s totally fine if you have a crude problem.
One of my kids was interested and the other was completely horrified. They’re not doing a great job at targeting their audience.
Flying cars exist, they’re just not cost effective. AFAICT there’s no GPT that is proficient at coding yet.