• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s good that these tools exist, but it’s so frustrating that it’s a constant cat and mouse game of Microsoft trying to make their products as cumbersome and shit as possible and the community trying to salvage Windows to the best of their ability.

    At what point do OEMs just say actually nah, I’m tired of you making our laptops frustrating to use?

    At what point do they say fuck it I’m going the Valve route and moving away from a company that wants to undermine my products and my brand?

    • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      11 months ago

      The people who use tools like this are in the minority. The majority (probably the vast majority) of people use Windows as it is out of the box.

        • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          Everyone. Everywhere.

          It blows my mind, but then I realise that we here on Lemmy are the 1% of IT users.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah right‽ Why do people keep the full search box enabled? It takes up so much space. I usually switch to the search button.

          I even see quite a lot of people in IT (not talking about tech or devs) that keep it enabled.

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think it’s one of those things that just becomes mentally invisible after a while. Like Microsoft slowly just drops in a new bar here, a stock ticker there, and there’s a point where a majority of folks are like “…Was that always there?” and don’t bother hunting for a way to turn it off like we do lol.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yes, I know.

        But it’s not like these people actually love ads all over the place, or bing results in start menus, or popups asking them to pwetty pwease use OneDrive, or can you pwetty pwetty pwease use Edge instead of Chrome, they just either:

        • don’t know they can get rid of that stuff

        • don’t trust tools and are afraid they’ll break something or the tools will contain a virus

        • don’t care enough to research this crap

        • view using their PC as a chore anyway, and so power through the annoyances

        I don’t own a Mac, and don’t intend to, but of the biggest things people like about them is that there are far fewer of these types of annoyances.

        It’s not just extreme power users that can be irked by all this crap - they’re just the ones who do things about it and chat on forums about it. A normal person just sighs and thinks ugh I’d rather just do this on my phone

        • asbestos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          View using their PC as a chore anyway, and so power through the annoyances

          Damn, good one.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      it’s a constant cat and mouse game

      It’s not just Microsoft. Never heard of always on DRM? Or government making it difficult for people to receive assistance (disability or homeless)?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      At what point do OEMs just say actually nah, I’m tired of you making our laptops frustrating to use?

      You’re under the impression that most people care about the horrible parts of windows?

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I think they do.

        Enough to do much about it, other than maybe buy a MacBook if they have money to burn? Nah.

        But enough to use their PC less and try to do as much as possible on their phone/iPad? Honestly, yeah, I think so.

        I hear normies complaining about stuff in Windows all the time. It’s just when you go “well you could…” they turn off and don’t want to do anything about it, because to them you may as well be giving them advice on how they can hack their washing machine to wash clothes faster. It’s just an appliance.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Is your point that you think laptop and desktop makers could increase sales by ditching windows? That feels like suicide to me and I am a Linux lover. At what point do they do that is what you asked. When they’re desperate enough to take a risk, if ever, would be my guess

    • Andy Reid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      At what point do OEMs just say actually nah, I’m tired of you making our laptops frustrating to use?

      LTT put out an (surprisingly insightful) video about ChromeOS and how it’s kind of secretly spreading Linux. I don’t think its crazy to say that in 5-10 years ChromeOS or similar will be the default and Windows will be a premium add on or something.

        • Andy Reid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          lol honestly maybe competition will force them to reverse the ehittification of their product

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I doubt it. Google will squander it away one way or another. It could work on a technical level, I’ve been using flex since before Google bought it for family members, it’s just poorly advertised and explained.

    • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      To be fair, Window$ has been bloat since the very day M$ stole it from its Unix roots, and Linux is everything that the OS could’ve been were it not run by money-grubbin’ cringelords.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Why wtf?

          Microsoft started as a UNIX-based programming company. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix

          Hell you see remnants of it in the reserved filename list.

          https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/naming-a-file?redirectedfrom=MSDN

          Devices in windows are not typically “files” like they are in unix/linux… So why CON, PRN, AUX, NUL, COM0, COM1, COM2, COM3, COM4, COM5, COM6, COM7, COM8, COM9, COM¹, COM², COM³, LPT0, LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4, LPT5, LPT6, LPT7, LPT8, LPT9, LPT¹, LPT², and LPT³ are all reserved? Because they maintained compatibility with features businesses used at the time… and never deprecated the function.

          Edit:

          image of downvotes on this post as of Feb 14 2024
          Why are we downvoting literal computer history? It is a known fact that Windows started on Unix systems. It’s a known fact that they released their own BSD-based software up to and including a full fledged Unix-based OS, and it’s a known fact that MS-DOS 1 and 2 were both Unix compatible. This is LITERALLY the definition of “roots”. Are we so touchy here that we can’t acknowledge actual computing history?

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Hmm, I always thought MS was founded to steal/modify MS DOS. Interesting that they briefly did Unix stuff, but I still take issue with the way op phrased it. “Their Unix roots” makes it sound like they were heavily invested in Unix and carried that forward even into windows. I don’t know if they used any of that code in windows, but if they did you’d never know it by using dos or any windows version I’ve seen. Even despite both having command line interfaces, almost everything is different from Unix except the command “cd”, to my recollection.

          • WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            “Started as”

            Yeah, no. Yes Xenix was a thing but it would be incorrect to say that it ever was their main product.

            I don’t think anyone has ever hinted on that NT has a unix code base except for some “borrowed” networking code from bsd.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              it would be incorrect to say that it ever was their main product.

              They made several full versions of it… It was not simply a one off product.

              While Xenix 2.0 was still based on Version 7 Unix,[30] version 3.0 was upgraded to a Unix System III code base,[12]: 9 [31][32] a 1984 Intel manual for Xenix 286 noted that the Xenix kernel had about 10,000 lines at this time.[10]: 1–7  It was followed by a System V R2 codebase in Xenix 5.0 (a.k.a. Xenix System V).[33]

              Also,

              Microsoft’s Chris Larson described MS-DOS 2.0’s Xenix compatibility as “the second most important feature”.[38] His company advertised DOS and Xenix together, describing MS-DOS 2.0 (its “single-user OS”) as sharing features and system calls with Xenix (“the multi-user, multi-tasking, Unix-derived operating system”), and promising easy porting between them.[39]

              So they were simultaneously created AND interoperable (from a program development perspective). This was a full fledged item.

              Edit: to elaborate a little better. If they were simultaneously developed… and interoperable. And one item is Unix-based outright. Then it’s safe to say that the other item (MS-DOS) in this case is also pretty steeped in Unix roots.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Sounds like an ageist to me. As far as I knew, Microsoft’s first product was msdos but I guess I’m just too unintelligent and “young” (lol) to know better

  • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    For me it is so weird, that you have to use extra tools to disable telemetry and unwanted features in windows systems. Why is windows not giving me a central option to decide on those things? Is it maybe because they do not want me to decide for myself and therefore splitting the places where I need to disable all that unwanted stuff as opaque as possible? Can they be more obvious that they do not value your opinion on how you want your OS to behave?

    Quit Windows. It is a dead end and get worst with every release.

    If you tolerate this, then your children will be next.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s a shame. I really love Windows 10. It’s fast and the UI’s ergonomy is near perfect.

      On my work laptop we recently had to switch to Windows 11 and it’s a fucking pain to use. You have to jump through so many hoops and do extra clicks to do what you want. And the start menu has become completely useless. And I hate the gaps and rounded corners everywhere. And that’s just on the surface. Performance is piss poor and you have all that crap spying on you to collect your usage data.

      The day Windows 10 becomes unsupported is the day I go 100% Linux.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Forced to use it at work, too, and only by the grace of being in the IT department do I have the ability to make it less shitty.

        There’s registry entries to restore the full context menu, and PowerToys Run has effectively become my defacto start menu, though obviously you need to use the keyboard so it’s not a perfect UI replacement. Meanwhile for searching, I’ve got Everything running and set global keyboard shortcuts/touchpad gestures to it. Maybe I’ll grab an old gaming mouse and shortcut them to the extra buttons.

        They finally implemented never combine on the taskbar, and it’s…tolerable, but buggy and still resizes things for no reason

        Unfortunately I’ve yet to find a way to get some damn 90° angles back. I can not wait for a few years down the line when we finally swing away from this Apple-chasing “bubbles with an inch between them on a white/black field” design aesthetic. I’m tired of everything looking like a toy, especially at the cost of its actual utility.

        And not just a toy, the same toy. It’s seriously Corporate Memphis levels of lifeless, forced design with no character, creativity, or ingenuity.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Forced to use it at work, too, and only by the grace of being in the IT department do I have the ability to make it less shitty.

          I’m a user 🤮 and the IT on my Japanese employer is run by Mordac the Information Preventer. FML.

      • ballskicker@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        This has been exactly my stance as well apart from ever having used Win11. Never did and never plan to, downloaded Mint a few months ago to start getting familiar with it. Turns out I’m not real great at technical stuff but I’m getting there. Dual monitors was kind of a booger and now I’m trying to figure out how to install some games since Bottles is being a real wiener about Battle.Net. I’m glad there’s so many resources and forums out there but I still hope some version of Linux gets dumbed down a little more before Win10 sunsets to make the transition easier for us blue collar folk

        • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I had problem with bottles and battle.net too. It went flawless year ago, then I went to play other games and when I finally wanted to play Diablo 2 again, battle.net kept crashing all the time. I solved it by running that bottle in wine-ge. Easier way to get it (and manage such prefixes) is ProtonUp-qt that is also on flathub.

          • ballskicker@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Steam’s been fantastic! Problem for me is that some of the battle.net games aren’t on there. If there’s a way to download those somewhere and run them through Steam that’d be incredible. I didn’t even think to consider searching around for that possibility. I’ve seen people run Diablo 4 on their Decks so it’s clearly possible, I’m just still learning how to troubleshoot Linux and I’m trying to be extra careful since their OS doesn’t have much in the way of guardrails to prevent dummies from nuking themselves

            • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Yeah, I will say I have personally found Blizzard games tend to run poorly on Linux. It has mostly lead to me playing less Blizzard games. I have more games than I can possibly ever play, I don’t need to bang my head against a wall for a specific one. Though, it has also helped their sequels have been less-good than their prior games. Starcraft 2 wasn’t as good as Starcraft, Diablo 4 just never appealed like Diablo 3, I’m now playing more Guild Wars 2 and ignoring WoW, etc etc.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Windows 10 already had telemetry (what you call spying) and what it didn’t have in the past got patched in. So when it comes to that both Windows 10 and 11 are the same.

        Performance is totally fine for me on Windows 11, but the new right click context menu sucks.

        Overall there’s really not much difference between the two otherwise.

      • BumbleBeeButt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve been using Manjaro on an old modded chromebook. Windows is not gonna be on my next machine build.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      If you tolerate this, then your children will be next.

      Trust me, I’m not installing Windows as the Operating System for my Children’s brains.

    • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I switched to linux yeats ago but i now need to build myself a windows 11 base image thats as lightweight as possible for my vms and im dreading that immeansly. I just want onw toll that can kill literally everything thats unessasary. I mean unless proton and wine has gotten good enough to run autocad programs.

    • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Quit for what? Linux is a mess with hardware like fingerprint readers being unsupported, and without the most used commercial software. Mac OS is a buggy mess lately, and it ties your data to a time bomb hardware and that damn walled garden.

      Windows is the best general use OS out there, and Microsoft knows it. We need regulation to stop that abuse.

      • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Like clockwork! Almost as reliable as the OS /s

        Linux has no mainstream advertising so word-of-mouth is the only way it gets adopted.

        • FoxBJK@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s also about the customer having better options beyond “modify the ever-living shit out of Windows until it behaves”. Microsoft only does these things because they know how many hundreds of millions of customers are locked into their ecosystem. No matter what they do, no matter how poorly they treat their customers, they’ll keep coming back to buy more! So why should they care? Why should they slow down or offer some privacy-friendly version for anything below $1000 per person? Hell, I’m surprised Microsoft hasn’t been steadily raising the price of Windows over the years. Not like the customers are going to actually switch, right?

      • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Honestly, I would switch to Linux if it didn’t take so much time to learn. I’ve messed around on a Raspberry π 4th gen board, but have no real experience. To really make the Linux jump, I’d need a tutor or something.

        Also I don’t know which of my games will be compatible.

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Mint and Debian are great, and once you set everything as you like it, they’re pretty solid. Pop_OS is easy if you have an Nvidia GPU too.

          As for comparability, proton has all but settled the issue. The SteamDeck runs on Linux after all. Take a look on Proton Database to check if a game works well or not. FWIW, every game I’ve tried save one has been flawless, and that one did things with files and wallpapers.

          If you have a second computer you don’t need working, I’d recommend just trying something on it, switch distributions now and then. See how far you can get with just Linux.

        • Mr. Forager@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Most games are compatible, you can also check https://protondb.com/ for each game, how people play it and how they run it. It’s a very neat website!

          About the jump: Do it now, and you’ll thank yourself later. I did it with no prior experience myself and didn’t find it difficult at all tbh, as previous comment suggested, try Mint first of you’re afraid. And if you want an easy to use one that also focus on a bit of gaming then try PopOS! Don’t let the amount of choices discourage or confuse you, just pick one and go with it. Feel free to message me if you ever need any help 🌻

        • JohnAnthony@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I finally switched to Linux as my daily driver (gaming, browsing, watching stuff) a week ago. Admittedly I have been using it at work for a few years.

          • I chose Pop!_OS as a distribution, because it supposedly streamlines nvidia driver hassles and I wanted to give it a try
          • Installed the OS, Discord, Steam, no problems
          • Installed and played Raft, Vampire Survivors, TW Warhammer 3, Outer Wilds, no problems and no additional config needed

          Just to add a voice to the positive feedback! If you have a spare computer or hard drive, I absolutely encourage you to try it out!

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s a nix based distro called SnowFlake that I am not sure why but think might be interesting for you.

        Might be your whining. Will never know, I guess

        • tenextrathrills@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You’re hilarious! Your projection is truly first class. I’m amazed that you think it’s totally fine for some nix bro to post the exact same comment on every post about windows but anyone who dissents is a snowflake. Get the fuck over yourself.

          You’re truly an embarrassment to us linux enjoyers.

  • boolean@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    install random third party software that may be sniffing or leaking information to remove shady features from windows that sniff and leak information.

    windows sucks.

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      11 months ago

      The app is open source so you can review the not-leaking-your-information that it does yourself.

      Windows on the other hand …

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wonder how many apps this actually happens for, my guess is “way less than people think”

        • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          That they leak information? I work in commercial software development and I have to do a lot of open source security reviews. The answer is: virtually none.

          Private, closed-source software on the other hand… If it could sniff your farts and send the smell to advertisers, it would; in almost all cases.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, that people actually take the time to check the source code before installing them

            I’ve seen enough crypto scams to know that even when the code is public, people don’t bother… Heck, there are scanning tools for crypto that tell you how risky the shitcoins are and people still get scammed out of thousands of dollars!

            • cley_faye@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              Not everyone have to check something. But there are people that do routinely check popular stuff, either on their own or for their job. Sometimes this raises issues, which are usually handled appropriately. Of course if you download a little unknown piece of software made by a single person and never advertised anywhere, you’ll have to do the job yourself. But anything semi-popular attracts enough attention to get some level of audit, at least because business uses a lot of open source. There are even businesses whose main product is auditing and developing open source, kind of like bounty hunters.

              And of course there are counter-examples, too. TrueCrypt got pulled out quite dramatically, and I’m not sure we know why even now. But the more sensitive the stuff, the higher the chance of it getting some level of investigation.

            • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              As a software user, you can either care about your privacy or not. Caring about your privacy and not either vetting what you’re planning to use or checking that someone else has before using it, is akin to sticking your hand in a fire to find out if it’s hot.

              Taking that analogy further, malicious open source software is kind of like a burning building. It only takes one person to raise the flag for it to spread pretty quickly through social media or other means that it is malicious. The whole community doesn’t need to acknowledge the fire for something to be done about it.

        • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, but it is virtually impossible to read all code running on your machine. At the very least it is an option. While I personally wouldn’t search the code of random open source calculator app. I’ll be damned if I ain’t inspecting something like this.

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      My reason for not using them is that they tend to be overly aggressive in what they remove. I only need a few reg tweaks and denying permissions on a few files. These often go whole hog and remove whole components, almost all apps etc. I actually use one drive, I don’t want its files also removed.

  • blackstampede@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I used to have a power shell script that a coworker gave me that would uninstall a huge number of services and apps on windows, change a bunch of config settings etc.

    I’ve always wished there were a way to roll out a stripped windows release as an open source project without getting sued.

  • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Although im part of the Linux crowd, if you’re tired of reapplying debloat scripts every update, you could get the W10 IoT LTSC edition that only has security patches with no updates. You will have to pirate it though.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      A non pirate solution is Windows Server Essentials 2022. It’s like $300, has zero bloat and updates don’t ever hijack your settings. Oh and you’ll get over 10 years of security patches.

      • long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        does Windows Server Essentials comes with a desktop GUI? Can you install Steam and things like that like you’d normally do in Windows?

        I’m happy with Linux, but my brother who is a gamer has Windows but he’s annoyed af by updates and the AI nonsense. This seems like a perfect solution.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes it is regular Windows but stripped of all the consumer apps like TikTok and CandyCrush. It has one extra app: Server Manager (A GUI like Control Panel with buttons to disk manager, device manager etc) which loads at startup and is easily disabled.

    • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This might be interesting. I’m looking to have a few installs to test some of my programs in an actual Windows environment without having to daily drive Windows and without having to deal with all the unnecessary changes MS wants to make.

        • Cihta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Neat. I tried this last night on my once top of the line machine (in 2012) because why not…

          It didn’t upgrade my win10 install but at least it didn’t delete all my data. Maybe I goofed on that as I was tired.

          I used the 23H2 iso but it installed 22H2.

          I didn’t use the script, it picked up my existing valid key.

          It fails to update. Perhaps that’s the point or bloat would come back?

          But if it can’t update then what’s the point?

          Again, might be my fault but I’m not really trusting this image yet. Not enough to reinstall and relicense my tools.

          I use Linux where I can but I’m bound to some windows-only proprietary software. I do use a stripped down win10 VM for a lot of it but at least it updates.

          Will update this comment if i find that I’m at fault.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            LTSC only gets security updates. No feature updates.

            It’s intended for stability, so you don’t wake up and suddenly nothing works right because of an update. That won’t happen on LTSC.

            I wouldn’t use it to update an existing install, that’s not what it’s intended for (and probably pointless as it may retain stuff that came with the existing os).

            https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-it-pro-blog/ltsc-what-is-it-and-when-should-it-be-used/ba-p/293181

            • Cihta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Thank you. It does seem cool but I can’t really keep up. I appreciate the explanation. I really thought it was a fully workable de-bloated win11. Which it is, but I need long term installs. I learned a few things though! So not a waste.

              If i could ever figure out how to run a windows app via VM. Seamless mode comes close but not quite enough.

              Anyway thanks and I didn’t mean to be negative, just didn’t totally get it.

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I do both and happy with debloated Windows 11 Enterprise with automatic updates restricted to security only. Pirating now is running a powershell command that fetches activation scripts from github.

    • ___@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just make the jump. I keep a cheap n100 box as a backup.

  • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can you imagine installing Windows and having to install 10 seperate programs just to fix all the issues with it?

    • GlitchZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Every day with Windows is like this. It’s a fucking nightmare. I don’t know what else to do.

        • YodaDaCoda@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I tried installing Linux on the new work laptop yesterday.

          The keyboard wasn’t recognised. The fucking keyboard.

          Apparently it’s fixed in kernel 6.6 but nothing has that yet coz they’re all using the earlier LTS

        • nutsack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          i didn’t even have to scroll to find the first instance of this comment

        • GlitchZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I have a few games that don’t run on Steam. How big of a pain is it to get them running?

          This is like 50-70% of my PC usage.

          • DreitonLullaby@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I game on Linux and mainly play games bought from GOG. Both GOG and Epic games are extremely easy to get working, and are as simple as downloading Heroic Games Launcher, signing into GOG and/or Epic, and choosing the game you want to download from your library. While it is possible to use the official GOG Galaxy client with Lutris and WINE, I personally don’t recommend it, as it’s quite a glitchy and laggy experience, and is only done by people who can’t live without GOG achievements. For GOG… just use Heroic. It’s just as easy to use as the official Galaxy client is on Windows and also supports cloud-saves.

            I’ve never used Amazon, but Heroic also recently added downloading your Amazon Prime games as an option, which I imagine is just as easy to get working as GOG and Epic Games already are.

            This part isn’t necessary, but if you want to play those games but launch them from Steam, you can add each game individually to Steam as a non-steam game through the Lutris or Heroic Games’ interface. A handy app I recommend, which I never hear people mention, is BoilR, which automatically adds all of your non-steam games in bulk into your Steam Library.

            As for the EA App and Ubisoft Connect, I ditched them over a year ago due to not wanting to support the companies (same with Epic). I honestly don’t remember what the process was exactly for those launchers, but I do remember it was very easy to set up in Lutris.

            Lastly, I’ve never used Battle.net either, but I’ve heard it’s quite easy to set up in Lutris.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Right, right. Smh

          Onenote, publisher, CAD. Excel (and don’t give me open/libre can do it, no they can’t. They are marginally compatible).

          And a laundry list more of the issues trying to replace windows with Linux on the desktop.

          If you work by yourself and don’t share docs, yea, could probably work. I need to trust that what I send is what people see.

          Try to open an excel workbook with tables on open/libre and see what happens.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve no idea what MS are even doing with all this shit.

    I’m like 95% sure I had an AI icon in the search bar yesterday, and today it’s a briefcase. 🤷

    • KrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have no idea why they’re even remotely interested in Windows as a product anymore. Surely they can’t expect that much revenue from integrated AI services when most of the general public’s needs can be covered by web services that will severely outmatch Microsoft’s development speed (y’know because of juggling legacy code and all).

      Considering the fact that they gain most of their revenue by far from their Azure cloud services and enterprise customers, it just seems like a stupid business decision to invest this much into all kinds of random features for their desktop OS aimed at consumers.

      In proper systems architectecture theory, we generally try to avoid mixing up functionality this much because a modular design allows your system to evolve without too much pain. Why build all this crap into Windows when you can just opt-in by installing an application for it?

      I really don’t get it…

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve never had any major issues with windows and I can strip out what I don’t like, so whatevs. I like Linux, but gaming, so I roll with windows.

          Windows Server on the other hand, fuck that noise. Ugh.

          • averyfalken@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Gamings gotten pretty good with linux. I made the switcheroo when windows forced an update that undid a lot of my changes to windows AGAIN and I was like evwrytime they do this I have to take time to finish this and was pissed.

            All games I play work on Linux no problem and all the games I’ve been interested since then have worked day 1; but of course I’ve always taken issue with games that have kernel level anticheats.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m tired of playing the debloat game, especially with the frequency of Windows updates that undo and add things.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Problem I’ve had with all these “fixes” the issues come back or the OS craps the bed

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    I literally have a windows 10 installed that I haven’t logged in since before AI came up. WTF! I can only imagine the massive update when I try to login next time.

    • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      You should just login in to a linux distro instead. (╭☞´ิ∀´ิ)╭☞

        • frunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          You know you’re on Lemmy, right? This is how it works here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          • Agrivar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Hopefully, that includes the downvote parade you’re getting for being insufferable.

            • frunch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              It was an observation, but hey everyone go ahead and downvote me anyway. Happy Valentine’s Day, y’all – i love ya anyway 🥂❤️

  • Rooter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    As someone who uses windows to produce music, bloat is a huge issue, latencymon Is a great tool to check for programs and drivers that can cause audio dropouts.

    And win 11 has been great, didn’t have to change much to get it to work. I tried several forms of Linux and it was too slow, driver issues, and plugins that were impossible to get working.

    Win 10 was bad, but 7 was worse.

    • ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      It really is a shame that music production is so painful in Linux. All I need to make the final switch

      • kalkulat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        After leaving Macs (and Logic) (Apple software great, Apple iMac shit) switched to LInux over 10 years ago. Haven’t made music since (hardware in boxes). Fully learned that Linux music ain’t got that swing.

        I recently heard that newer PipeWire has improved things a quite a lot. Haven’t tried it yet … not sure I remember how to play any instruments any more.

      • Balinares@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        JACK is very cool and if you’re willing to tinker there’s some really awesome stuff that can be done with LADISH session management and e.g. native Linux VSTs.

        It’s still a non-option for musicians who just want to do music, not tinkering.

        • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I was mostly referring to the latency. RTOS kernel prioritizes timing over performance, so it should be right up your alley when it comes to music handling. I know it has been used in some instruments and mixers.

          Jack is kind of iffy to tinker around I agree, however PipeWire, which is these days standard on up to date distributions should handle latency much much better without any great need for tinkering as it supports all the interfaces of Jack, PulseAudio and others. So you can just use whichever application you want and you get low latency backend regardless.

          Things are improving at a rather fast pace in Linux world and even giving developers feedback is a useful contribution.

          • Balinares@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Thank you! I know all these things. This still doesn’t help when the DAW support and VST compatibility aren’t there.

            If you’re intent on doing music production on Linux, at least do yourself a favor and get a Reaper license, there are few enough pro DAWs that are Linux native. But be aware that many of the big industry VSTs are still not going to work. If you’re fine sticking to e.g. ZynAddSubFX or Pianoteq, though, knock yourself out.

            But you can’t reasonably expect musicians to jump those hoops and abandon their fav VSTs when their Windows tooling is there, and works.

            • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Am not expecting anything. Am just wondering how people in the industry are fairing with recent changes.

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      As someone who uses windows to produce music

      Exactly and some other media/creative stuff as well. Windows is the only way to run Ableton with full VST support on my own hardware. Then if I’m going to need a Windows workstation anyway, I might as well use it for gaming too, and lump in all my other “power station” uses. It’s sometimes frustrating when you mention this and people who aren’t familiar with these programs to try to debate you or assume you haven’t entertained the alternatives. In my case I run Linux on my laptop and servers, and even some of my instruments like the monome norns and m8 are rpi based. Real time audio synthesis on linux is actually amazing, PureData and Supercollider are the ones I’m somewhat familiar with.

      • Rooter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah but slightly lower latency is irrelevant really, windows based can get lower than 2ms now. And it just works.

        • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah and in those linux examples its not really latency that’s important, plus those things run on Windows too. The Monome Norns is a raspberry pi shield with a linux platform and development community around it, where people write scripts to turn it in to all manner of musical devices. When it comes to a full DAW with VST support it’s basically OSX or Windows, and if you don’t want to be restricted to Apple hardware then congrats, you’re using Windows.