Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

    • Narauko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      Librewolf didn’t take as much adjustment as I would have expected, and it even supports toning down specific security postures for QoL niceties like Firefox account sync. Made the switch just to try it out and haven’t gone back. Excited to see what people come up with for more forks/hard forks in the future.

    • TooManyGames@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not really. Ads aren’t gonna dissappear, with Mozillas tech, they’d at least be more private than what Google will implement.

  • mwguy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Come and join me in Firefox and try out container tabs. Super powerful when you’re trying to keep home and work identities seperate.

  • sandbox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    11 hours ago

    We’re going to have a serious problem on our hands soon with compatibility. I’m a software dev and I’m already seeing a few issues here and there where Chrome is being treated as the default expected browser and features don’t work on Firefox.

    Firefox doesn’t support a fair few Chrome features because of security and privacy reasons, such as WebHID, WebUSB, etc.

    Devs, please stop using those features. I know it’s tempting, but they’re basically bribes to encourage you to sell out to Google. Don’t do it.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      Firefox doesn’t support a fair few Chrome features because of security and privacy reasons, such as WebHID, WebUSB

      I’m very serious about my opinion that we are better off without them. If the feature does not exist, it cannot be activated by a bug in the permission system, and also the lesser technically inclined people won’t allow them by reflex/accident

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 hours ago

      We’re going to have a serious problem on our hands soon with compatibility. I’m a software dev and I’m already seeing a few issues here and there where Chrome is being treated as the default expected browser and features don’t work on Firefox.

      It’s basically IE6 and ActiveX all over again.

    • spookedintownsville@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Most “Chrome-only” web applications I have to use I can get around just by changing my user agent string and everything works fine. I try not to use that stuff when I can, though.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is my experience. They are just taking your default agent and throwing up a message because they can’t be assed to do minimal testing in FF.

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Some of the older stuff is indeed that way, but there are more and more features which Firefox can’t support. Web-based custom keyboard configuration tools, tools to flash phone firmware, and one niche MiniDisc tool all are chrome-only things I’ve had to open Chrome to use

      • Frays6142@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Teams works in Firefox, I sadly have to use it almost every day interacting with clients who use teams for comms.

        • Frays6142@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ve not had either of those issues on my laptop, using teams through Firefox. I wonder if there is something else going on there.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Google’s working on fixing that for you right now. That’s more people switch to Firefox and there’s futures don’t work they’ll start complaining to the developers and then to Firefox. Microsoft road the it only works in IE train for a long time and it eventually buried them

    • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m using Firefox as my only browser. If everything works in Firefox that’s fine for me.

      That’s the best advantage of only making websites / web applications for fun (for friend groups, video games, family etc)

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, but that’s my point, not everything works in Firefox now - even though admittedly it’s relatively niche stuff - and my prediction is that if we continue on our current course Firefox will either have to compromise their commitment to privacy and security or will become more and more unusable.

        • Kronusdark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I saw this quote a while back “if you only make code that works in chrome you aren’t a web developer, you are a google developer.”

  • wabafee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s going to be internet explorer era again. I wonder which will replace chrome in the future.

    • hjjanger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      How? If you would have said Chromium based era, then sure, possible. Internet Explorer for 64 bit was officially retired June 15, 2022 and permanently disabled through an Edge update.

      • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        it’s not literally just an analogy how a single browser guided by private corporate interests is treated as the only standard

    • 5dh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It sorta protected Chrome’s monopoly in the browser world for years. Now that they’ve established that monopoly firmly, it’s time to crack down on things that diminish monetisation.

  • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I find it funny how so many people are switching back to firefox but its been my default since I was like 10. I had crappy laptops when I was young and it was the only one that worked, it works amazingly for my modern computer.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, I remember when Chrome was first released, I was already on Firefox, and I downloaded and tried Chrome…

      I absolutely hated the UI, and kept on using Firefox.

      Over the years, I have seen many articles about how Chrome is better because it is faster, I never had an issue with Firefox, so I kept using it.

      The only time I swiched from Firefox since version 1.0 was when they launched the Australis redesign as it made it look like a boring chrome copy.

      I swiched to Pale Moon, a Fitefox fork which kept the old UI, then when they released the Quantum redesign, I switched back.

      • nul9o9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        My biggest gripe with Firefox is that if I’m too fast and start typing into the address bar when it first launches, it’ll clear the auto text selection and start prepending my input onto the URL.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    15 hours ago

    While this will drive some users to Firefox, we all know it won’t be enough. Too many people simple don’t know, or don’t care, it won’t affect their lives in any meaningful way, or so they will believe. Google will be harming the tech illiterate and normies (sorry for the slur) because money, bullshit, and to drive the stake deeper into the monopoly. If you have older family members using chrome, sit them down and explain to them the dangers of the internet without adblock.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It gets me thinking. Tech literate people are the types to install blockers, and would be the same type of people both motivated and knowledgeable about how to switch browsers. On the line of thinking it seems like it is just going to drive them away from Chrome. Tech illiterate people remain unaffected since they are getting ads anyway.

      But then on the other hand, if someone is tech literate then why are they even still using Chrome? Does such a person value whatever advantage Chrome theoretically provides over their ad-blocking?

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        as a chromium browser user - i’ve been meaning to switch to firefox, and i know it’ll take me maybe a day, but it feels like so much workkkk. In a similar fashion i’ve been meaning to switch to Linux for ages too. I guess it just hasn’t gotten bad enough for me to take action

        as long as my adblockers & script blockers work, i’m not forced to upgrade to win11, and win10 still has security updates i don’t think it’s pushing on my discomfort buttons strong enough. I know the day will come, but like with a lot of things in my life - why do something today when i can do it tomorrow?

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 minutes ago

          if that helps, switching browsers is a lot easier than switching your OS. the automatic import brings over most of your data (bookmarks, passwords, history, …), and you only need to handle the addons, if you had any, and the browser settings if you need anything from there

        • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I use Opera for myself, but I have to use Chrome for work reasons (user profiles for different work areas based on whatever email is being used at the company computer). Thing is, Firefox also lacks the feature that makes me use Opera: speed dial. My Opera starting page is my speed dials, and speed dials are 10x better than just bookmarks, and I wouldn’t want to go through all the trouble of transfering literally hundreds of saved pages to standard bookmarks. But, if ublock fully stops working, guess I’ll have no choice.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 minutes ago

            I don’t know what exactly speed dialsare in opera, but firefox’s homepage can show website tiles in multiple rows

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          What do you mean “work”? What is it that needs to move?

          You just fire up Firefox and start using it. It’ll even scrape your chrome setup to move bookmarks and stuff over.

          It’s not an OS. It’s an application.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            i don’t use chrome itself. i have a lot of saved things, roughly a million tabs open at every moment, and passwords saved which i do not remember

            • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              There’s extensions to export all your open tabs and then a similar extension to import those tabs and open them as a session in Firefox. Source: I, too, have a million tabs open at every moment, and had to do that to transition myself. Same for exporting/importing passwords.

            • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              This is all mostly automatically transfered over… I don’t know about passwords though

              • Billiam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I’m not sure if Firefox pulls passwords when you import your data, but you can manually export passwords from Chrome and import them into Firefox.

        • jape@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I feel you. It’s vey much a convenience thing, and sitting down with something you’re used to.

        • Yi K@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          That’s some procrastination going on. Sometimes you should force yourself to start doing something for a minute or so and things will eventually change.

    • forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If you have older family members, you could try just installing Firefox for them and tell them it’s their internet now. This worked for me parents.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The Fox has been re-promoted to my daily driver as of this year. Chrome still in play for work stuff & sites don’t have ads.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m only using it atm for extensions that are, ironically enough, blocked on Firefox… Though thats only one website in particular.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s not about intelligence it’s about what keeps you up at night. Most people aren’t bothered by cookies and ads, somehow.

        • omarfw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          It used to be worse. Pop up ads are mostly a thing of the past. The web used to be an advertisement shit hole and there were no ad blockers back then.

          Regardless, you’re right. I don’t understand why or how people could be ignorant of the existence of adblock in 2024 unless they’re boomers.

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Since ads began, there have been ad-blockers. You just didn’t know about them.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          And the creepiness. Advertisers can deduce many habits based on the information you give them. Some techniques can tell when people are pregnant before they do based on their pathing inside the store, for instance.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Most people are stupid, myopic imbeciles that arent bothered by anything until it personally affects them.

        Then they’ll howl like wolves at the moon about the great injustice of it all, and how could anyone allow this to happen.

    • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      For those of us who work in (or love) tech - we (myself included) grossly overestimate how much the general public cares about, or cares to be informed about, this stuff. Heck, even people in tech who know better.

      I wish it wasn’t the case but look how long and hard Microsoft moved on Internet Explorer and ActiveX back in the early days of the web.

      Google and Chrome is just another bit of history repeating.

      As an aside, I’ve been using Zen for about a week and it’s been wonderful. Easy transition from Firefox because it largely is Firefox, so all my containers, extensions, and settings carried over. Zen’s workspaces provide exactly the promise I’d hoped “tab groups” brought with Safari (but never worked right). I just wish there was an equivalent to the Hush plug-in on Safari (even after a year of full-timing FF, consent-o-matic is quite poor).

      • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yeah I work in tech and I’m the only one that cares enough to use Firefox. All my colleagues use chrome or chrome with makeup.
        Maybe ad blocking will be what broke the camel’s back, but I doubt more than a few will care enough to switch.

    • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The problem here is not just Chrome (as in Google Chrome) but Chromium, the web engine behind many browsers out there (such as Opera, Vivaldi, Edge, among many many others). For now there are two main web engines available, those being Chromium and Gecko (Firefox, Palemoon and many other Firefox forks). The deprecation of Manifest v2 is a Chromium change that includes (and focuses on) Chrome.

    • Final Remix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I kinda have to at work. Our classroom computers reset between classes and Chrome is the only browser installed. I might ask IT about that, moving forward, given uBlock getting neutered soon.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 minutes ago

        when you ask them, don’t only mention ublock, but the privacy aspects of only allowing the browser of the largest data collection fueled ad company

      • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I have a similar issue at my school as well. Chrome is the only allowed browser, and each of us have to use our own school email as our login session in chrome, so we get that much of user space, and that actually works quite decently. I had ublock installed on my user account so far, but if it breaks, I’ll just have to suffer. Although, the real problem is that the school I work in uses some digital books that only work 100% in Chrome, and all show some form of weird behaviour in non-chromiun based browsers. And there’s a 0 chance they are changing it.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I know people who I thought brilliant until they said they were voting for trump. Way to shatter my opinion of you, jagoff.