• FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Is anyone really surprised?

    I do think they will at least release Squadron 42, but the main game is never coming out.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    and here I was thinking they always planned to finish the game in about 16 to 30 years.

    sorry I meant durrrr

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    That was my concern long ago when I entered the game.

    The problem is, CIG have financially incentivised themselves, knowingly or not, to never finish the game.

    Being alpha game means you can wipe everything again and again. And they do! One thing they do not touch, however, are ships purchased with real world money. And players do buy those ships in order to not start the game from scratch over and over again, and pay a lot for it, in hundreds and often thousands of dollars!

    Upon release, on the other hand, no wipes are planned, and this means one thing: revenue will absolutely plummet as players just buy ships for in-game currency instead of actual cash. Releasing the game now is a suicide move, as CIG won’t be able to blatantly extort players for their money anymore.

    • Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Not to mention that they also incentivise players to spend real-world money by having their website have a secret club for whales (I think you need to spend either $1K or $5K in order to have the button appear) to spend even more money then they did to even gain access originally.

      Edit: clarity and conciseness: added “originally” to the end of the last sentence.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    And then, compare it to No Man’s Sky, who gave us lofty expectations, failed to deliver on launch, but actually kept with it despite no new revenue flowing into the game from existing buyers. And now we have something incredible. We have a universe that is unfathomably large. We have multiplayer, we have all sorts of events and quests. Freighters! You can piece together your own ships now.

    I hope we can eventually build space stations or pilot Capital Ships. No Man’s Sky came out in 2016. In 8 years it has done far more than SC has done with far less of a budget.

    Do I wish we could have everything that Roberts promised? Sure. But I also have a bridge to sell that you can at least walk over.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      NMS certainly evolved a lot, but I wouldn’t call it incredible. Also, despite the game universe being absurdly large, you can see everything there is to see visiting less than 20 star systems

      All the daily quicksilver quests are a fucking chore, too.

  • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Do people just not know who and what Chris Roberts is?

    This is what he’s done throughout his career - the only thing that’s notable about Star Citizen really is the scale of it and thus the opportunities he has to find ever more things to obsessively tinker with.

    It’s entirely possible that if Microsoft hadn’t bought out Digital Anvil and given him the boot, this wouldn’t even be Star Citizen - it would be Freelancer, coming into its 25th year of delays.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        16 hours ago

        the wing commander series was famous for inflated development costs, freelancer was repeatedly delayed and eventually released like five years after it’s announcement, and since then… he’s been working on star citizen

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Chris Roberts is still rich, and could probably retire right now without worrying about anything. He could tank the company, and he wouldn’t care.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        When has any really rich person ever gone “you know what? I actually have enough now…”?

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Wozniak is probably the most famous example. He recognized the corrupting nature of money, decided he had enough, and stopped to live in comfort and occasionally work towards causes he finds important

          Lots of people have done the same… But if they’re rich and still chasing after money? They’ll never stop

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I guess Notch as well. Sold Minecraft for an obscene amount of money and got into indefensible right wing views instead.

        • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s the majority of them, but ragebait articles aren’t written about them, so you have no idea who they are.

          Don’t be so easily manipulated by media.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well no shit. He figured out that as long as you never “release” a finished game, you’re not going to be blamed for “bugs” while still collecting money on in-game purchases.

    There’s a reason he made sure that the in-game store was perfected and ready to go long before the game was anywhere near completed. It’s been the plan ever since he and his team realized that the ultimate scope was likely out of their reach.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If massive universe sums like that were technically feasible all of the other studios would have done it. They were overly ambitious and didn’t understand the limits

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I mean Elite Dangerous is right there, finished, playable and fun.

        • Player2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          And it first released a decade ago already (in a couple months)

            • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Nope, it’s real time travel with no FTL. The reason it’s “finished” is that it takes hundreds of real life years to get anywhere, so they have plenty of time to populate the world’s before the first players arrive.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yeaaah, but they pulled the exact same thing Star Citizen did initially. They overpromised and underdelivered heavily. It took them years to get where it is now.

      • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        In terms of immersion I think they’ve done a great job. Played during a free weekend. But they need to aim for a gameplay loop, polish, and release. Not this feature creep mentality

  • shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, Star Citizen is the world’s most expensive tech demo, that is the picture book definition of scope creep. It’ll just keep getting more and more complicated, but never get to any kind of a “complete game” state.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I work as project manager, just spent the entire week fighting a client on a new project’s scope, because he wanted more things done by the team than what was agreed in the proposal.

      Anytime I read about this game. I have to do breathing excercises in a corner to calm my anxiety.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Because Crysis looked good, Chris Roberts mandated that Star Citizen would use Cryengine 3.

    To make astronomically large spaces fit in the game engine from 2009, they made everything infinitesimally small.

    So now due to the inaccuracy inherent in floating point calculations, instead of invisibly nudging things a few millimeters in the wrong direction, teleports people hundreds of feet out of their ships into space if they bump into a physics object, ladder, elevator, etc.

    This is what happens when an ideas guy with no technical knowledge is making technical decisions.

    • Nailbar@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is what happens when an ideas guy with no technical knowledge is making technical decisions.

      If you’re talking about Chris, he’s a coder too, and wrote some of the entiry container system for the game.

      I’m not sure where you’re getting your info about them scaling everything down and that being the cause for wonky physics, though.

    • G0ldenSp00nA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is not even true, they rewrote the engine to support native 64-bit precision to let them fit large spaces, they didn’t just make everything small. They basically employ all the people that used to make Cryengine since Crytek went out of business, so the engine they are building is actually pretty good.

      • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I am engine developer, but even to this day you can clearly see Cryengine 3.x issue in star citizen.

        They simulate zero-g areas as a Cryengine underwater map. You routinely see stuff floating as if in water even on planets with gravity.

        You can also witness strange bugs that confirm the size issue (that they made everything extremely small in a Frankenstein version of a Cryengine map); one example would be your footmarks suddenly becoming massive.

        The completely fucked up physics in sc (e.g. tanks bouncing like beachballs) is also a legacy of Cryengine 3.0.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      To make astronomically large spaces fit in the game engine from 2009, they made everything infinitesimally small.

      In fairness, when Star Citizen first went in to development CE3 was a modern engine.

    • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Jesus fucking christ, that was their fundamental approach?!

      … Did they ever come anywhere close to a dynamic server model, with dynamically sized in game zones being handled by dynamically changing server clusters, dependant on player count in an area?

      I remember making some comments in a thread in the main SC forums about it almost a decade ago that were basically to the effect of: that’s almost certainly impossible to pull off with enough fidelity / low lag to actually work in a real time, absurdly open world shooter game, but if they could pull it off it would basically be the greatest achievement in game networking history.

      • perslue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        After 10 years they increased the per server population from 50 to 100, but don’t worry server messing soon TM.

        So no.

        • limitedduck@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Meshing tests have gone up to 2000 and the shards that were left on overnight were 300-500. The current evocati build of 4.0 has meshing enabled, just limited to 100 for now

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Wow… I’m pretty crap at making decisions, but like… not that crap 😅

      That’s like an impressively bad choice